Cited by 151CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseVirus-based gene therapy research

Evaluating CRISPR-based prime editing for cancer modeling and CFTR repair in organoids

Open access
Geurts, Maarten H, de Poel, Eyleen, Pleguezuelos-Manzano, Cayetano, Oka, Rurika, Carrillo, Léo, Andersson-Rolf, Amanda, Boretto, Matteo, Brunsveld, Jesse E +3 more·2021·Life Science Alliance

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Prime editing is a recently reported genome editing tool using a nickase-cas9 fused to a reverse transcriptase that directly synthesizes the desired edit at the target site. Here, we explore the use of prime editing in human organoids. Common TP53 mutations can be correctly modeled in human adult stem cell–derived colonic organoids with efficiencies up to 25% and up to 97% in hepatocyte organoids. Next, we functionally repaired the cystic fibrosis CFTR-F508del mutation and compared prime editing to CRISPR/Cas9–mediated homology-directed repair and adenine base editing on the CFTR-R785* mutation. Whole-genome sequencing of prime editing–repaired organoids revealed no detectable off-target effects. Despite encountering varying editing efficiencies and undesired mutations at the target site, these results underline the broad applicability of prime editing for modeling oncogenic mutations and showcase the potential clinical application of this technique, pending further optimization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26508/lsa.202000940

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contrary to base editing, efficient use of prime editing uses two sgRNAs that require significant optimization, resulting in need to test multiple sgRNA combinations.

    “Contrary to base editing, efficient use of prime editing uses two sgRNAs that require significant optimization for efficient use. This results in the need to test multiple sgRNA combinations to find the most effective combination65,66.”

    From One-step generation of tumor models by base editor multiplexing in adult stem cell-derived organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction (page not available) describes a pegRNA and a second PE3 guide RNA that can improve prime-editing efficiency, and the Methods report using guide pairs. But the second guide is presented as an enhancement, not a requirement; neither those passages nor the Discussion’s call for further improvement says that both guides require significant optimization or that multiple combinations must be tested to find the best one. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • We have previously used prime editing in hepatocyte and colon organoids to model tumorigenesis.

    “We have previously used prime editing in hepatocyte and colon organoids to model tumorigenesis66.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 151

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aguilar F, Hussain SP, Cerutti P (1993) Aflatoxin B1 induces the transversion of G–>T in codon 249 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 8586– 8590. 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8586 8397412 PMC47402 · DOI
  2. Aida T, Wilde JJ, Yang L, Hou Y, Li M, Xu D, Lin J, Qi P, Lu Z, Feng G (2020) Prime editing primarily induces undesired outcomes in mice. BioRxiv 10.1101/2020.08.06.239723 (Preprint posted August 6, 2020). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, Bignell GR, Bolli N, Borg A, Børresen-Dale AL, (2013) Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500: 415– 421. 10.1038/nature12477 23945592 PMC3776390 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Andersson-Rolf A, Mustata RC, Merenda A, Kim J, Perera S, Grego T, Andrews K, Tremble K, Silva JC, Fink J, (2017) One-step generation of conditional and reversible gene knockouts. Nat Methods 14: 287– 289. 10.1038/nmeth.4156 28135257 PMC5777571 · DOI
  5. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, Chen PJ, Wilson C, Newby GA, Raguram A, (2019) Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576: 149– 157. 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 31634902 PMC6907074 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Blokzijl F, Janssen R, van Boxtel R, Cuppen E (2018) MutationalPatterns: Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes. Genome Med 10: 33. 10.1186/s13073-018-0539-0 29695279 PMC5922316 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Boj SF, Vonk AM, Statia M, Su J, Vries RR, Beekman JM, Clevers H (2017) Forskolin-induced swelling in intestinal organoids: An in vitro assay for assessing drug response in cystic fibrosis patients. J Vis Exp 2017: 55159. 10.3791/55159 PMC5408767 28287550 · DOI
  8. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y, Kweon J, Kim HS, Bae S, Kim JS (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res 24: 132– 141. 10.1101/gr.162339.113 24253446 PMC3875854 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chow RD, Chen S (2020) pegFinder: A pegRNA designer for CRISPR prime editing. BioRxiv 10.1101/2020.05.06.081612 (Preprint posted May 8, 2020). · DOI
  10. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339: 819– 823. 10.1126/science.1231143 23287718 PMC3795411 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dekkers JF, Wiegerinck CL, de Jonge HR, Bronsveld I, Janssens HM, de Winter-de Groot KM, Brandsma AM, de Jong NW, Bijvelds MJC, Scholte BJ, (2013) A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids. Nat Med 19: 939– 945. 10.1038/nm.3201 23727931 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Depristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, Del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43: 491– 498. 10.1038/ng.806 21478889 PMC3083463 · DOI
  13. Drost J, van Jaarsveld RH, Ponsioen B, Zimberlin C, van Boxtel R, Buijs A, Sachs N, Overmeer RM, Offerhaus GJ, Begthel H, (2015) Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells. Nature 521: 43– 47. 10.1038/nature14415 25924068 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Forbes SA, Beare D, Boutselakis H, Bamford S, Bindal N, Tate J, Cole CG, Ward S, Dawson E, Ponting L, (2017) COSMIC: Somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res 45: D777– D783. 10.1093/nar/gkw1121 27899578 PMC5210583 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fujii M, Matano M, Nanki K, Sato T (2015) Efficient genetic engineering of human intestinal organoids using electroporation. Nat Protoc 10: 1474– 1485. 10.1038/nprot.2015.088 26334867 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH, Tang W, Chen L, Sun N, Zeina CM, Gao X, Rees HA, Lin Z, (2018b) Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556: 57– 63. 10.1038/nature26155 29512652 PMC5951633 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jager M, Blokzijl F, Sasselli V, Boymans S, Janssen R, Besselink N, Clevers H, Van Boxtel R, Cuppen E (2018) Measuring mutation accumulation in single human adult stem cells by whole-genome sequencing of organoid cultures. Nat Protoc 13: 59– 78. 10.1038/nprot.2017.111 29215633 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337: 816– 821. 10.1126/science.1225829 22745249 PMC6286148 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kim HK, Yu G, Park J, Min S, Lee S, Yoon S, Kim HH (2021) Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 39: 198– 206. 10.1038/s41587-020-0677-y 32958957 · DOI
  20. Koblan LW, Doman JL, Wilson C, Levy JM, Tay T, Newby GA, Maianti JP, Raguram A, Liu DR (2018) Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol 36: 843– 846. 10.1038/nbt.4172 29813047 PMC6126947 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kosicki M, Tomberg K, Bradley A (2018) Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol 36: 765– 771. 10.1038/nbt.4192 30010673 PMC6390938 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Li H, Durbin R (2010) Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26: 589– 595. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 20080505 PMC2828108 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lin Q, Jin S, Zong Y, Yu H, Zhu Z, Liu G, Kou L, Wang Y, Qiu JL, Li J, (2021) High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat Biotechnol 10.1038/s41587-021-00868-w 33767395 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Liu P, Liang SQ, Zheng C, Mintzer E, Zhao YG, Ponnienselvan K, Mir A, Sontheimer EJ, Gao G, Flotte TR, (2021) Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat Commun 12: 2121. 10.1038/s41467-021-22295-w 33837189 PMC8035190 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339: 823– 826. 10.1126/science.1232033 23287722 PMC3712628 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Matano M, Date S, Shimokawa M, Takano A, Fujii M, Ohta Y, Watanabe T, Kanai T, Sato T (2015) Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids. Nat Med 21: 256– 262. 10.1038/nm.3802 25706875 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin CY, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, Trevino AE, Scott DA, Inoue A, Matoba S, Zhang Y, (2013) Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154: 1380– 1389. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 23992846 PMC3856256 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schene IF, Joore IP, Oka R, Mokry M, van Vugt AHM, van Boxtel R, van der Doef HPJ, van der Laan LJW, Verstegen MMA, van Hasselt PM, (2020) Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models. Nat Commun 11: 5352– 5358. 10.1038/s41467-020-19136-7 33097693 PMC7584657 · DOI
  29. Vonk AM, van Mourik P, Ramalho AS, Silva IAL, Statia M, Kruisselbrink E, Suen SWF, Dekkers JF, Vleggaar FP, Houwen RHJ, (2020) Protocol for application, standardization and validation of the forskolin-induced swelling assay in cystic fibrosis human colon Organoids. STAR Protoc 1: 100019. 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100019 33111074 PMC7580120 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zafra MP, Schatoff EM, Katti A, Foronda M, Breinig M, Schweitzer AY, Simon A, Han T, Goswami S, Montgomery E, (2018) Optimized base editors enable efficient editing in cells, organoids and mice. Nat Biotechnol 36: 888– 893. 10.1038/nbt.4194 29969439 PMC6130889 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zuo E, Sun Y, Wei W, Yuan T, Ying W, Sun H, Yuan L, Steinmetz LM, Li Y, Yang H (2019) Cytosine base editor Generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science 364: 289– 292. 10.1126/science.aav9973 30819928 PMC7301308 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Geurts, M. H., de Poel, E., Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C., Oka, R., Carrillo, L., Andersson-Rolf, A., Boretto, M., Brunsveld, J. E., van Boxtel, R., Beekman, J. M., & Clevers, H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Oncode Institute (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Oncode Institute,Princes Maxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Clevers, Hans
Venue
Life Science Alliance
Published
2021-08-09
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
e202000940
ISSN
2575-1077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188144652
Cited by
151
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Life Science Alliance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C6307/A29058)
  • The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research
  • NWO Building Blocks of Life Project: Cell Dynamics within Lung and Intestinal Organoids (737.016.009)
  • Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (NCFS), HIT-CF Program, the Dutch Health Organization ZonMw, the Netherlands
  • The Netherlands Organ-on-Chip Initiative, an NWO Gravitation Project (024.003.001)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the government of the Netherlands
  • Oncode Institute, Dutch Cancer Society, Gravitation Program
  • The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
prime editing, CRISPR/Cas9 nickase, human organoids, colonic organoids, hepatocyte organoids, TP53 mutation, cancer modeling, cystic fibrosis, F508del mutation, adenine base editing, homology-directed repair, off-target effects, genome editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Alleles, Animals, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Mutation, Oncogenes, Organoids, Genetic Therapy, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Amino Acid Substitution, Hepatocytes, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review