Cited by 364CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringAnimal Genetics and ReproductionVirus-based gene therapy research

Efficient genetic engineering of human intestinal organoids using electroporation

Fujii, Masayuki, Matano, Mami, Nanki, Kosaku, Sato, Toshiro·2015·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Gene modification in untransformed human intestinal cells is an attractive approach for studying gene function in intestinal diseases. However, because of the lack of practical tools, such studies have largely depended upon surrogates, such as gene-engineered mice or immortalized human cell lines. By taking advantage of the recently developed intestinal organoid culture method, we developed a methodology for modulating genes of interest in untransformed human colonic organoids via electroporation of gene vectors. Here we describe a detailed protocol for the generation of intestinal organoids by culture with essential growth factors in a basement membrane matrix. We also describe how to stably integrate genes via the piggyBac transposon, as well as precise genome editing using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Beginning with crypt isolation from a human colon sample, genetically modified organoids can be obtained in 3 weeks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2015.088

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For non-viral methods, electroporation results in higher organoid-editing efficiencies.

    “For the non-viral methods, electroporation has been found to result in higher organoid-editing efficiencies (Fujii et al., 2015).”
  • The use of the RNP method allowed an almost 3-fold increase in editing efficiency compared to previously published electroporation-based delivery methods using a plasmid-based approach.

    “The use of the RNP method allowed an almost 3-fold increase in the editing efficiency compared to previously published electroporation-based delivery methods using a plasmid-based approach (Fujii et al., 2015).”
  • Editing efficiencies of human organoids using non-viral electroporation methods have been only up to 30%.

    “However, to date, the editing efficiency of organoids with the use of non-viral electroporation methods has only been up to 30%”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujii, M., Matano, M., Nanki, K., & Sato, T.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sato, Toshiro
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2015-09-03
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1474-1485
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2159582900
Cited by
364
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
intestinal organoids, colonic organoids, electroporation, piggyBac transposon, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, gene delivery, Matrigel, organoid culture, intestinal diseases
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Flow Cytometry, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Intestines, Organoids, Electroporation, Cell Culture Techniques, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review