Two-Row Wampum Reimagined: Understanding the Hybrid Digital Lives of Contemporary Kanien’kehá:ka Youth
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the digital life of one Indigenous youth and her experience with multiliteracies. The piece emphasizes the hybrid identity of contemporary Indigenous youth who not only reconcile traditional and contemporary identities, but also participate actively in several digital communities and life worlds. Through a participatory action research approach, listening to the digital experiences of youth can have fundamental impacts for creating more socially just pedagogical practices for multimodal multiliteracies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indigenous youth can connect, affirm and give a voice to their own particular cultural and linguistic identities which have not been constructed, imagined, or set by outsiders.
“Indigenous youth can connect, affirm and give a voice to their own particular cultural and linguistic identities which have not been constructed, imagined, or set by outsiders (Katsi’sorókwas Jacobs, 2019; Rice et al., 2016).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Katsi’sorókwas Jacobs, 2019
The Theoretical Framework (p. 6) describes Indigenous youth creating digital content that revitalizes relationships to culture and challenges fixed notions of Indigenous identity. The Implications section (p. 13) calls for forums where youth can tell their own stories rather than have their experiences defined for them. These passages support the cultural-identity and youth-voice parts of the claim, but do not specifically establish that youth affirm linguistic identities. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jacobs, C. K.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, Curran Katsi’sorókwas
- Venue
- Studies in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Brock University Library
- Published
- 2019-03-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-72
- ISSN
- 1911-4788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2931360697
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Studies in Social Justice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- wampum, Indigenous youth, digital life, multiliteracies, hybrid identity, online communities, Indigenous pedagogy, social justice education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
