Cited by 4Food Safety and HygieneNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Assessment of Food Safety, Knowledge and Practices among Students and Staff at Zarqa University, Jordan

Open access
Wesal Y. Alraei, Thana’ Y. Aljaraedah, Jafar M. El-Qudah, Thana’ Y. Aljaraedah, Hashem A. Abu-Harirah, Razan J. Rahahleh, Mohammad Alsadi·2023·Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research

Abstract

The food safety matter is an issue that is discussed widely, but cases of food poisoning in particular, are still ongoing. This may be associated with person’s level of knowledge and practices on food safety. This current study aimed to evaluate knowledge and practices levels related to food safety and to examine the relationship of some demographic characteristics with knowledge and practices levels related to food safety, as well as the relationship between food safety knowledge and practices among the students and staff members of Zarqa University, Jordan. The study was conducted via a Google form that was set up for this study. 406 subjectsparticipated in the study, where 37.7% were males and 62.3% of the participants were females. Results showed that 90.6% and 75.1% of the participants had a good knowledge and a high level of practices related to food safety, respectively. The findings also showed a significant relationship between age, marital status and the knowledge scores related to food safety, and a significant relationship (P˂ 0.05) between age, gender, marital status and practices related to food safety (P˂ 0.05). Further, a small significant positive relationship between food safety knowledge and food safety practices was found (P˂ 0.05). Overall, it was found that there is a good knowledge level related to food safety and high food safety practice level among the participants. As a result; to achieve an advanced level of knowledge continuing education programs, are required to increase understanding food safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26538/tjnpr/v7i5.6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 4

Authors
Alraei, W. Y., Aljaraedah, T. Y., El-Qudah, J. M., Aljaraedah, T. Y., Abu-Harirah, H. A., Rahahleh, R. J., & Alsadi, M.
Affiliations
Zarqa University (JO)
Venue
Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
2878-2883
ISSN
2616-0684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379282526
Cited by
4
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Zarqa University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food safety knowledge, food safety practices, university students, university employees, food poisoning, demographic factors, age, marital status, gender differences, Zarqa University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review