Cited by 4EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Algorithm Contest of Calibration-free Motor Imagery BCI in the BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2021: A survey

Open access
Luo, Jing, Mao, Qi, Wang, Yaojie, Shi, Zhenghao, Hei, Xinhong·2022·Brain Science Advances

Abstract

Objective: From September 10 to 13, 2021, the finals of the BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2021 were held in Beijing, China. Eleven teams participated in the Algorithm Contest of Calibration-free Motor Imagery BCI. The participants employed both traditional electroencephalograph (EEG) analysis methods and deep learning-based methods in the contest. In this paper, we reviewed the algorithms utilized by the participants, extracted the trends and highlighted interesting approaches from these methods to inform future contests and research recommendations. Method: First, we analyzed the algorithms in separate steps, including EEG channel and signal segment setup, prepossessing technology, and classification model. Then, we emphasized the highlights of each algorithm. Finally, we compared the competition algorithm with the SOTA algorithm. Results: The algorithm employed in the finals performed better than that of the SOTA algorithm. During the final stage of the contest, four of the top five teams used convolutional neural network models, suggesting that with the rapid development of deep learning, convolutional neural network-based models have been the most popular methods in the field of motor imagery BCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26599/bsa.2022.9050011

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, J., Mao, Q., Wang, Y., Shi, Z., & Hei, X.
Affiliations
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Luo, Jing
Venue
Brain Science Advances
Published
2022-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
127-141
ISSN
2096-5958 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283734500
Cited by
4
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
motor imagery, calibration-free BCI, EEG signal processing, convolutional neural networks, EEG channel selection, signal preprocessing, motor imagery classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review