The importance of user segmentation for designing digital therapy for adolescent mental health: Findings from scoping processes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/12656
Abstract
© 2019 Journal of Medical Internet Research. All rights reserved. Background: New Zealand youth, especially those of Maori and Pacific descent, have high rates of depression, anxiety, and self-harm, but have low rates of help-seeking from mental health professionals. Apps, computerized therapy, and other digital tools can be effective, highly scalable treatments for anxiety and depression. Co-design processes are often used to foster engagement with end users, but this does not always lead to high levels of engagement. Objective: We aimed to carry out preliminary scoping to understand adolescents' current internet use and diversity of preferences to inform a planned co-design process for creating digital mental health tools for teenagers. Methods: Interactive workshops and focus groups were held with young people. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Results: Participants (N=58) engaged in 2 whanau (extended family) focus groups (n=4 and n=5), 2 school- or community-based focus groups (n=9 each), and 2 workshops (n=11 and n=20). The authors identified 3 overarching themes: (1) Digital mental health tools are unlikely to be successful if they rely solely on youth help-seeking. (2) A single approach is unlikely to appeal to all. Participants had diverse, noncompatible preferences in terms of look or feel of an app or digital tool. The authors identified 4 user groups players or gamers, engagers, sceptics, and straight-talkers. These groups differed by age and degree of current mental health need and preferred gamified or fun approaches, were open to a range of approaches, were generally disinterested, or preferred direct-to-the-point, serious approaches, respectively. (3) Digital mental health tools should provide an immediate response to a range of different issues and challenges that a young person may face. Conclusions: Defining the preferences of different groups of users may be important for increasing engagement with digital therapies even within specific population and mental health-need groups. This study demonstrates the importance of scoping possible user needs to inform design processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Talanoa Research Methodology: A Developing Position on Pacific Research
Vaioleti, T. M. (2016) · Waikato Journal of Education · doi:10.15663/wje.v12i1.296 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Fleming, T., Bavin, L., Lucassen, M., Stasiak, K., Hopkins, S., & Merry, S. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9275 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Self-citationTamasese, K., Peteru, C., Waldegrave, C., & Bush, A. (2005) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01572.x · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Fleming, T., Dixon, R., Frampton, C., & Merry, S. (2012) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465811000695 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Self-citationOrlowski, S. K., Lawn, S., Venning, A., Winsall, M., Jones, G. M., Wyld, K., Damarell, R. A., Antezana, G., Schrader, G., Smith, D., et al. (2015) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.4361 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Help-Negation and Suicidal Ideation: The Role of Depression, Anxiety and Hopelessness
Wilson, C. J., & Deane, F. P. (2010) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9487-8 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Computer-based and online therapy for depression and anxiety in children and adolescents
Stasiak, K., Fleming, T., Lucassen, M. F. G., Shepherd, M. J., Whittaker, R., & Merry, S. N. (2016) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/cap.2015.0029 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fleming, T., Merry, S., Stasiak, K., Hopkins, S., Patolo, T., Ruru, S., Latu, M., Shepherd, M., Christie, G., & Goodyear-Smith, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Fleming, Theresa
- Published
- 2020-07-22
- OpenAlex
- W4244478148
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Victoria University of Wellington
- Victoria University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- customer segmentation, digital mental health, adolescent mental health, co-design, user preferences, gamification, depression, anxiety, self-harm, mobile application design, user engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review