The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system--FUEL subsystem
Open accessAbstract
software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior
Anderson, H. E. (1982) · doi:10.2737/int-gtr-122 · Cited by 984
Handbook for Inventorying Downed Woody Material
Brown, J. K. (2019) · Cited by 842
How to Predict the Spread and Intensity of Forest and Range Fires
Rothermel, R. C. (1983) · doi:10.2737/int-gtr-143 · Cited by 742
Self-citationHandbook for inventorying surface fuels and biomass in the Interior West
Brown, J. K., Oberheu, R. D., & Johnston, C. M. (1982) · doi:10.2737/int-gtr-129 · Cited by 323
Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers /
Brown, J. K. (1978) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.68796 · Cited by 194
Fire spread through porous fuels from the conservation of energy
Frandsen, W. H. (1971) · Combustion and Flame · doi:10.1016/s0010-2180(71)80005-6 · Cited by 145
Charts for interpreting wildland fire behavior characteristics
Andrews, P. L., & Rothermel, R. C. (1982) · doi:10.2737/int-gtr-131 · Cited by 114
Self-citationPredicting Changes in Chaparral Flammability
Rothermel, R. C., & Philpot, C. W. (1973) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/71.10.640 · Cited by 94
Self-citationField procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions
Rothermel, R. C., & Rinehart, G. C. (1983) · doi:10.2737/int-gtr-142 · Cited by 79
Self-citationPredicting fire behavior in palmetto-gallberry fuel complexes
Hough, W. A., & Albini, F. A. (1978) · Cited by 73
Estimating live fuel moisture for the 1978 national fire danger rating system /
Burgan, R. E., & Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station (Ogden, U. (1979) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.68713 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.
Fernandes, P. M., & Botelho, H. S. (2003) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf02042 · Cited by 718
Scott, J. H., & Burgan, R. E. (2005) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-gtr-153 · Cited by 636
Self-citationAssessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior
Scott, J. H., & Reinhardt, E. D. (2001) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-29 · Cited by 614
Mathematical models and calculation systems for the study of wildland fire behaviour
Pastor, E. (2003) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00017-0 · Cited by 362
Stephens, S. L. (1998) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00293-4 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgan, R. E., & Rothermel, R. C.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
- Published
- 1984
- OpenAlex
- W108444638
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 12
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.