Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers /

Brown, James K.·1978

Abstract

Relationships between live and dead crown weight and d.b.h.(ranging from to 40 inches), crown length, tree height, and crown ratio are presented for 11 conifer species in the Rocky Mountains.D.b.h. was highly correlated with crown weight; however, for most species, addition of height, crown length, and especially crown ratio improved precision.Site index and stand density improved precision of estimates slightly for about one-half of the species.Crown ratio accounted for most of the differences in crown weight between dominant and intermediate crown classes.Relationships between bole weights and d.b.h. and height are presented for trees up to 4 inches d.b.h.For partitioning estimates of crown weight into foliage, and branchwood diameter classes (0-to 0. 24-inch, 0. 25-to 0. 99-inch, 1. 00-to 2. 99-inch and 3.00-inch and larger), accumulative fractions of foliage and branchwood and their relationship to d.b.h. are presented.Relationships between weights of foliage and branchwood by diameter classes, highly correlated with branch basal diameter, are included.Bulk densities for foliage and branchwood of live crowns ranged from 0.04 to 0. 14 lb/ft and were approximately twice that for foliage alone.Bulk densities and crown moisture contents were greater in the upper crowns..

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.title.68796

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Brown, J. K.
Published
1978
OpenAlex
W45805744
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
7.25
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers /. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5962/bhl.title.68796
The paper
Brown, J. K. (1978). Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers /. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68796

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.