The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The forest inventory and analysis database description and users manual version 1.0
Abstract
Describes the structure of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (FIADB) and provides information on generating estimates of forest statistics from these data. The FIADB structure provides a consistent framework for storing forest inventory data across all ownerships across the entire United States. These data are available to the public.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Scheller, R. M., & Spies, T. A. (2012) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.015 · Cited by 309
Carbon sequestration in the U.S. forest sector from 1990 to 2010
Woodbury, P. B., Smith, J. E., & Heath, L. S. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.008 · Cited by 287
Van Deusen, P. C., & Heath, L. S. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.010 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, P. D., Brand, G. J., Alerich, C. L., Bednar, L. F., Woudenberg, S. W., Glover, J. F., & Ezell, E. N.
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W1486825888
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The forest inventory and analysis database description and users manual version 1.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2737/nc-gtr-218
- The paper
- Miles, P. D., Brand, G. J., Alerich, C. L., Bednar, L. F., Woudenberg, S. W., Glover, J. F., & Ezell, E. N. (2001). The forest inventory and analysis database description and users manual version 1.0. https://doi.org/10.2737/nc-gtr-218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.