The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Forest Resources of the United States, 2002
Open accessAbstract
Development of this report has been very much a team effort and we recognize here a long list of people who made significant contributions. We greatly appreciate the help of the staffs of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Research Work Units at the Forest Service Research Stations and the Forest Management staffs in the regional offices of the National Forest System who compiled the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perlack, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/885984 · Cited by 2,085
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L. P., Frolking, S., Betts, R. A., Feddema, J., Fischer, G., Fisk, J. P., Hibbard, K., Houghton, R. A., Janetos, A., et al. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 · Cited by 1,284
Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface
Theobald, D. M., & Romme, W. H. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.002 · Cited by 487
A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981–2000
LEPERS, E., LAMBIN, E. F., JANETOS, A. C., DeFRIES, R., ACHARD, F., RAMANKUTTY, N., & SCHOLES, R. J. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0115:asoior]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 478
Zhu, J. Y., Pan, X., & Zalesny, R. S. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2654-8 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Vissage, J. S., & Pugh, S. A.
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W1547904935
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2737/nc-gtr-241
- The paper
- Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Vissage, J. S., & Pugh, S. A. (2004). Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2737/nc-gtr-241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
