Cited by 1,284Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesClimate variability and modelsRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands

Open access
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L. P., Frolking, S., Betts, R. A., Feddema, J., Fischer, G., Fisk, J. P., Hibbard, K. +14 more·2011·Climatic Change

Abstract

In preparation for the fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the international community is developing new advanced Earth System Models (ESMs) to assess the combined effects of human activities (e.g. land use and fossil fuel emissions) on the carbon-climate system. In addition, four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios of the future (2005–2100) are being provided by four Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) teams to be used as input to the ESMs for future carbon-climate projections (Moss et al. 2010 ). The diversity of approaches and requirements among IAMs and ESMs for tracking land-use change, along with the dependence of model projections on land-use history, presents a challenge for effectively passing data between these communities and for smoothly transitioning from the historical estimates to future projections. Here, a harmonized set of land-use scenarios are presented that smoothly connects historical reconstructions of land use with future projections, in the format required by ESMs. The land-use harmonization strategy estimates fractional land-use patterns and underlying land-use transitions annually for the time period 1500–2100 at 0.5° × 0.5° resolution. Inputs include new gridded historical maps of crop and pasture data from HYDE 3.1 for 1500–2005, updated estimates of historical national wood harvest and of shifting cultivation, and future information on crop, pasture, and wood harvest from the IAM implementations of the RCPs for the period 2005–2100. The computational method integrates these multiple data sources, while minimizing differences at the transition between the historical reconstruction ending conditions and IAM initial conditions, and working to preserve the future changes depicted by the IAMs at the grid cell level. This study for the first time harmonizes land-use history data together with future scenario information from multiple IAMs into a single consistent, spatially gridded, set of land-use change scenarios for studies of human impacts on the past, present, and future Earth system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deforestation peaks in the first half of the 21st century.

    “Besides, the deforestation peaks in the first half of the 21st century 41 , with land cover assumed to remain constant beyond 2100.”

    From Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    The RCP8.5 scenario description (section 2.3 Biomass density; page unavailable) projects forest-cover loss of 300 million hectares from 2000 to 2050, versus 150 million hectares from 2050 to 2100. That supports faster loss in the first half of the century for one scenario, but does not establish a deforestation peak or the unqualified claim across scenarios. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Betts RA (2007) Implications of land ecosystem-atmosphere interactions for strategies for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Tellus B 59(3):602-615
  2. Butler JH (1980) Economic Geography: Spatial and Environmental Aspects of Economic Activity. John Wiley, New York, p 402
  3. D'Almeida C, Vorosmarty C, Marengo J, Hurtt G, Dingman S, Keim B (2006) A water balance model to study the hydrological response to different scenarios of deforestation. J Hydrol 331(1-2):125-136
  4. D'Almeida C, Vorosmarty C, Hurtt G, Marengo J, Dingman S, Keim B (2007) The effects of deforestation on the hydrological cycle in Amazonia: a review on scale and resolution. Int J Climatol 27(5):633-647
  5. Haden-Guest S, Wright JK, Teclaff EM (eds) (1956) A World Geography of Forest Resources. Ronald Press Co, New York, p 736
  6. Houghton RA, Hackler JL (2003) Sources and sinks of carbon from land-use change in China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17(2). doi:10.1029/2002GB001970 · DOI
  7. Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR, Pacala SW, Levin SA (1998) Terrestrial Models and Global Change: Challenges for the Future. Global Change Biol 4(5):581-590
  8. IPCC (2000) Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Johns TC, Durman CF, Banks HT, Roberts MJ, McLaren AJ, Ridley JK, Senior CA, Williams KD, Jones A, Rickard GJ, Cusack S, Ingram WJ, Crucifix M, Sexton DMH, Joshi MM, Dong BW, Spencer H, Hill RSR, Gregory JM, Keen AB, Pardaens AK, Lowe JA, Bodas-Salcedo A, Stark S, Searl Y (2006) The new Hadley Centre climate model HadGEM1: Evaluation of coupled simulations. J Climate 19(7):1327-1353
  10. Kim SH, Edmonds J, Lurz J, Smith S, Wise M (2006) The Object-oriented Energy Climate Technology Systems (ObjECTS) Framework and Hybrid Modeling of Transportation in the MiniCAM Long-Term, Global Integrated Assessment Model. The Energy Journal Special Issue: Hybrid Modeling of Energy- Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down: 63-91.
  11. Klein Goldewijk K (2001) Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15(2):417-433
  12. Lefsky M (2010) A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15401. doi:10.1029/2010GL043622 · DOI
  13. Leith H (1975) Modelling the primary productivity of the world. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH (eds) Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 237-267
  14. Mace G. et al. (2005) Ch. 4 Biodiversity. In: Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Current State and Trends, Volume 1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. Washington
  15. Masui T, Matsumoto K, Hijioka Y, Kinoshita T, Nozawa T, Ishiwatari S, Kato E, Shukla PR, Yamagata Y, Kainuma M (2011) An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm -2 radiative forcing. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0150-5 · DOI
  16. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  17. Pereira HM et al. (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330:1496. doi:10.1126/science.1196624 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Piao S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Labat D, Zaehle S (2007) Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends. PNAS 104 (39):15242-15247
  19. Piao S, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Cadule P, Viovy N, Wang T (2009) Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial carbon cycle during the 20th century. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23(GB2046). doi:10.1029/2008GB003339 · DOI
  20. Pitman AJ et al. (2009) Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study. Geophys Res Lett 36:L14814. doi:10.1029/2009GL039076 · DOI
  21. Pongratz J, Reick CH, Raddatz T, Claussen M (2010) Biophysical versus biogeochemical climate response to historical anthropogenic land cover change. Geophys Res Lett 37:L08702. doi:10.1029/2010GL043010 · DOI
  22. Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR et al. (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183-237
  23. Ramankutty N, Gibbs HK, Achard F, DeFries R, Foley J, Houghton RA (2007) Challenges to estimating carbon emissins from tropical deforestation. Global Change Biol 13:51-66. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2486.2006.01272.x · DOI
  24. Riahi K, Gruebler A, Nakicenovic N (2007) Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(7):887-935
  25. Riahi K, Krey V, Rao S, Chirkov V, Fischer G, Kolp P, Kindermann G, Nakicenovic N, Rafai P (2011) RCP8.5: exploring the consequence of high emission trajectories. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y · DOI · Paper page
  26. Richards JF, Tucker RP (eds) (1988) World Deforestation in the Twentieth Century. Duke University Press, Durham, p 321
  27. Rokityanskiy D, Benitez PC, Kraxner F, McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Rametsteiner E, Yamagata Y (2007) Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74(7):1057-1082 (Special Issue: Greenhouse Gases-Integrated Assessment)
  28. Roy SB, Hurtt GC, Weaver CP, Pacala SW (2003) Impact of historical land cover change on the July climate of the United States. J Geophys Res 108(D24):4793. doi:10.1029/2003JD003565 · DOI
  29. Shevliakova E, Pacala SW, Malyshev S, Hurtt GC, Milly PCD, Caspersen J, Sentman L, Fisk J, Wirth C, Crevoisier C (2009) Carbon cycling under 300 years of land-use changes in the dynamic land model LM3V. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23:GB2022. doi:10.1029/2007GB003176 · DOI
  30. Smith WB, Vissage JS, Darr DR et al. (2001) Forest resources of the United States, 1997. North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-219, Forest Service. US Department of Agriculture, St Paul Steffen W et al. (2003) Global Change an the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Springer, New York
  31. Thomson AM, Calvin KV, Chini LP, Hurtt GC, Edmonds JA, Bond-Lamberty B, Frolking S, Wise MA, Janetos AC (2010) Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes: Results from RCP 4.5. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), doi:10.1073/pnas.0910467107 · DOI
  32. Turner BL II, Clark WC, Kates RM, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (eds) (1990) The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 713 UN (2004) World Population to 2300, UN.
  33. Van Minnen JG, Klein Goldewijk K, Stehfest E, Eickhout B, van Drecht G, Leemans R (2009) The importance of three centuries of land-use change for the global and regional terrestrial carbon cycle. Climatic Change 97:123-144. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9596-0 · DOI
  34. Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kalnuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, et al. (2011a). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z · DOI · Paper page
  35. Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, Den Elzen MGJ, Deetman S, Hof A, Isaac M, Klein Goldewijk K, Kram T, Mendoza Beltran A, Oostenrijk R, et al. (2011b). RCP2.6: Exploring the possibilities to limit global mean temperature change to less than 2°C. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3 · DOI
  36. Voldoire A, Eickhout B, Schaeffer M, Royer J-F, Chauvin F (2007) Climate simulation of the twenty-first century with interactive land-use changes. Clim Dyn 29:177-193. doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0228-y · DOI
  37. Zon R, Sparhawk WN (1923) Forest Resources of the World, Volume I. McGraw-Hill, NY, p 493

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L. P., Frolking, S., Betts, R. A., Feddema, J., Fischer, G., Fisk, J. P., Hibbard, K., Houghton, R. A., Janetos, A., Jones, C. D., Kindermann, G., Kinoshita, T., Klein Goldewijk, K., Riahi, K., Shevliakova, E., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Thomson, A., Thornton, P., van Vuuren, D. P., & Wang, Y. P.
Affiliations
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • Met Office (GB)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Ibaraki University (JP)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Hurtt, G. C.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2011-08-09
Volume
109
Issue
1-2
Pages
117-161
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2108940449
Cited by
1,284
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 23
FWCI
32.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government (GA01101)
  • Met Office (GA01101)
  • Office of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
land use change, land use transition, logging, shifting cultivation, RCP scenarios, integrated assessment models, Earth system models, historical land use reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review