Cited by 358Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Mathematical models of sleep regulation

Open access
Achermann, Peter·2003·Frontiers in Bioscience

Abstract

The level of EEG slow-wave activity (SWA) is determined by the duration of prior sleep and waking. SWA is a marker of nonREM sleep intensity and may serve as an indicator of sleep homeostasis. The two-process model of sleep regulation posits the interaction of the homeostatic Process S and the circadian Process C. Also models of neurobehavioral functions (three-process model; interactive models of alertness and cognitive throughput) are based on the concept of an interaction between homeostatic and circadian factors. Whether the interaction is linear or non-linear is still unresolved. Models may serve as a guiding principle for specifying the relationship between processes occurring at the macroscopic and microscopic level of analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2741/1064

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis originated from Borbely's two process model of sleep, assumes that, apart from a circadian process C, sleep and specifically SWS is regulated by a homeostatic process S, which rises during waking and declines during sleep.

    “The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis originated from Borbely's”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 358

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Daan, S., D. G. M. Beersma, D. J. Dijk, T. Åkerstedt & M. Gillberg: Kinetics of an hourglass component involved in the regulation of human sleep and wakefulness. In: Trend in Chronobiology: Advances in the Biosciences. Eds: W. T. J. M. Hekkens, G. A. Kerkhof and W. J. Rietveld, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 73, 183-193 (1988)
  2. Eds: J. Horne, Pontenagel Press, Bochum, Germany, 68-70 (1990)
  3. Åkerstedt, T. & S. Folkard: A model of human sleepiness. In: Sleep '90. Eds: J. A. Horne, Pontenagel Press, Bochum, Germany, 310-313 (1990)
  4. Massaquoi, S. & R. McCarley: Resetting the REM sleep oscillator. In: Sleep '90. Eds: J. Horne, Pontenagel Press, Bochum, Germany, 301-305 (1990)
  5. Van Dongen, H. P. A. & D. F. Dinges: Chronic partial sleep deprivation data point to a novel process regulating waking behavioral alertness. J Sleep Res 11, 232 (2002)
  6. Harrison, Y. & J. A. Horne: Sleep loss affects frontal lobe function, as shown in complex "real world" tasks. Sleep Res 25, 467 (1996)
  7. Achermann, P., D. G. M. Beersma & A. A. Borbély: The two-process model: ultradian dynamics of sleep. In: Sleep '90. Eds: J. A. Horne, Pontenagel Press, Bochum, Germany, 296-300 (1990)
  8. Kronauer, R. E.: A quantitative model for the effects of light on the amplitude and phase of the deep circadian pacemaker, based on human data. In: Sleep'90. Eds: J. A. Horne, Pontenagel Press, Bochum, Germany, 306-309 (1990)

Authors
Achermann, P.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Achermann, Peter
Venue
Frontiers in Bioscience
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2003
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
s683-693
ISSN
  • 1093-4715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1093-9946
OpenAlex
W2033160906
Cited by
358
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in bioscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
sleep regulation, mathematical model, two-process model, sleep homeostasis, circadian rhythm, EEG slow-wave activity, NREM sleep, alertness
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review