The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fetal wound healing
Open accessAbstract
The developing fetus has the ability to heal wounds by regenerating normal epidermis and dermis with restoration of the extracellular matrix (ECM) architecture, strength, and function. In contrast, adult wounds heal with fibrosis and scar. Scar tissue remains weaker than normal skin with an altered ECM composition. Despite extensive investigation, the mechanism of fetal wound healing remains largely unknown. We do know that early in gestation, fetal skin is developing at a rapid pace and the ECM is a loose network facilitating cellular migration. Wounding in this unique environment triggers a complex cascade of tightly controlled events culminating in a scarless wound phenotype of fine reticular collagen and abundant hyaluronic acid. Comparison between postnatal and fetal wound healing has revealed differences in inflammatory response, cellular mediators, cytokines, growth factors, and ECM modulators. Investigation into cell signaling pathways and transcription factors has demonstrated differences in tyrosine phosphorylation patterns and homeobox gene expression. Further research may reveal novel genes essential to scarless repair that can be manipulated in the adult wound and thus ameliorate scar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Singer, A. J., & Clark, R. A. F. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411006 · Cited by 6,106
Tissue oxygenation, anemia, and perfusion in relation to wound healing in surgical patients.
JONSSON, K., JENSEN, J. A., GOODSON, W. H., SCHEUENSTUHL, H., WEST, J., HOPF, H. W., & HUNT, T. K. (1991) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199111000-00011 · Cited by 462
Cited by
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
Inflammation in Wound Repair: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms
Eming, S. A., Krieg, T., & Davidson, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700701 · Cited by 2,429
Brown, L. F., Yeo, K. T., Berse, B., Yeo, T. K., Senger, D. R., Dvorak, H. F., & van de Water, L. (1992) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.176.5.1375 · Cited by 878
Wound healing: Biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories
Robson, M. C., Steed, D. L., & Franz, M. G. (2001) · Current Problems in Surgery · doi:10.1067/msg.2001.111167 · Cited by 503
Hinz, B. (2016) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenz, H. P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioscience
- Publisher
- IMR Press
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- s1240-1248
- ISSN
- 1093-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 1093-9946
- DOI
- 10.2741/1183
- OpenAlex
- W1542918066
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fetal wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2741/1183
- The paper
- Lorenz, H. P. (2003). Fetal wound healing. Frontiers in Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.2741/1183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.