The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wound re-epithelialization: modulating kerationcyte migration in wound healing
Abstract
An essential feature of a healed wound is the restoration of an intact epidermal barrier through wound epithelialization, also known as re-epithelialization. The directed migration of keratinocytes is critical to wound epithelialization and defects in this function are associated with the clinical phenotype of chronic non-healing wounds. A complex balance of signaling factors and surface proteins are expressed and regulated in a temporospatial manner that promote keratinocyte motility and survival to activate wound re-epithelialization. The majority of this review focuses on the mechanisms that regulate keratinocyte migration in the re-epithelialization process. This includes a review of cell attachments via desmosomes, hemidesmosomes, and integrins, the expression of keratins, the role of growth factors, cytokines and chemokines, eicosanoids, oxygen tension, antimicrobial peptides, and matrix metalloproteinases. Also reviewed are recently emerging novel mediators of keratinocyte motility including the role of electric fields, and signaling via the acetylcholine and beta-adrenergic receptors. These multiple regulators impact the ability of keratinocytes to migrate from the wound edge or other epidermal reservoirs to efficiently re-epithelialize a breach in the integrity of the epidermis. New discoveries will continue to uncover the elegant network of events that result in restoration of epidermal integrity and complete the wound repair process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing
Barrientos, S., Stojadinovic, O., Golinko, M. S., Brem, H., & Tomic‐Canic, M. (2008) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2008.00410.x · Cited by 3,583
Impaired Epidermal to Dendritic T Cell Signaling Slows Wound Repair in Aged Skin
Keyes, B. E., Liu, S., Asare, A., Naik, S., Levorse, J., Polak, L., Lu, C. P., Nikolova, M., Pasolli, H. A., & Fuchs, E. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.052 · Cited by 266
Accelerated wound healing by mTOR activation in genetically defined mouse models
Squarize, C. H., Castilho, R. M., Bugge, T. H., & Gutkind, J. S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010643 · Cited by 203
Brem, H., Kodra, A., Golinko, M. S., Entero, H., Stojadinovic, O., Wang, V. M., Sheahan, C. M., Weinberg, A. D., Woo, S. L. C., Paul Ehrlich, H., et al. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2009.26 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Raja, R.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioscience
- Publisher
- IMR Press
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8-12
- Pages
- 2849
- ISSN
- 1093-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 1093-9946
- DOI
- 10.2741/2277
- OpenAlex
- W2112006376
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound re-epithelialization: modulating kerationcyte migration in wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2741/2277
- The paper
- Raja, R. (2007). Wound re-epithelialization: modulating kerationcyte migration in wound healing. Frontiers in Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.2741/2277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.