Cited by 266Wound Healing and TreatmentsCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsSkin Protection and Aging

Impaired Epidermal to Dendritic T Cell Signaling Slows Wound Repair in Aged Skin

Open access
Keyes, Brice E., Liu, Siqi, Asare, Amma, Naik, Shruti, Levorse, John, Polak, Lisa, Lu, Catherine P., Nikolova, Maria +2 more·2016·Cell

Abstract

Aged skin heals wounds poorly, increasing susceptibility to infections. Restoring homeostasis after wounding requires the coordinated actions of epidermal and immune cells. Here we find that both intrinsic defects and communication with immune cells are impaired in aged keratinocytes, diminishing their efficiency in restoring the skin barrier after wounding. At the wound-edge, aged keratinocytes display reduced proliferation and migration. They also exhibit a dampened ability to transcriptionally activate epithelial-immune crosstalk regulators, including a failure to properly activate/maintain dendritic epithelial T cells (DETCs), which promote re-epithelialization following injury. Probing mechanism, we find that aged keratinocytes near the wound edge don't efficiently upregulate Skints or activate STAT3. Notably, when epidermal Stat3, Skints, or DETCs are silenced in young skin, re-epithelialization following wounding is perturbed. These findings underscore epithelial-immune crosstalk perturbations in general, and Skints in particular, as critical mediators in the age-related decline in wound-repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.052

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In animal models of IPF, bleomycin-induced injury and telomere deficiency drive fibroblasts and epithelial cells towards increased senescence, a feature also observed in lung tissue of IPF patients.

    “In animal models of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), bleomycin-induced injury66 and telomere deficiency72 drive fibroblasts and epithelial cells towards increased levels of senescence, a feature also observed in the lung tissue of patients with IPF.”

    From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Results section on aged keratinocytes addresses wound repair in mouse skin, not senescence in pulmonary fibrosis. Searches for bleomycin, telomere deficiency, and lung fibrosis found no passage in our copy supporting the claim attributed to citation 72. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our results are conceptually consistent with previous reports of large transcriptional changes with age in some cell identities and more subtle changes in others.

    “Our results are conceptually consistent with previous reports of large transcriptional changes with age in some cell identities and more subtle changes in others (Kowalczyk et al. 2015; Keyes et al. 2016; Davie et al. 2018; Keyes and Fuchs 2018).”
  • We surprisingly found minor transcriptional differences between aged and young MuSCs at a given point in the activation process.

    “We surprisingly found minor transcriptional differences between aged and young MuSCs at a given point in the activation process, consistent with previous reports (Cosgrove et al., 2014; Keyes et al., 2016; Sousa-Victor et al., 2014).”

    From Aging induces aberrant state transition kinetics in murine muscle stem cells (2020) · cites this paper as Keyes et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keyes, B. E., Liu, S., Asare, A., Naik, S., Levorse, J., Polak, L., Lu, C. P., Nikolova, M., Pasolli, H. A., & Fuchs, E.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Fuchs, Elaine
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
167
Issue
5
Pages
1323-1338.e14
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550080559
Cited by
266
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11
FWCI
24.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH/NCI (CA009673-36A1)
  • NIH (R01-AR050452)
  • Ellison Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
aged skin, wound healing, keratinocytes, epithelial-immune crosstalk, re-epithelialization, STAT3, skin barrier, aging, keratinocyte proliferation and migration
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Wound Healing, Signal Transduction, Keratinocytes, Interleukin-6, Lymphocyte Subsets, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review