Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical management of superficial digital flexor tendonitis: a comparative study in 219 horses (1992‐2000)

DYSON, S. J.·2004·Equine Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Summary: Reasons for performing study : There is a lack of long‐term follow‐up data for outcome of medical treatment of superficial digital flexor (SDF) tendonitis. Objectives : To determine whether intralesional injection of hyaluronan, beta aminoproprionitrile fumarate (BAPN) or polysulphated glycosaminoglycans (PSGAG) or systemic administration of PSGAG yielded better results than a controlled exercise programme alone in the management of SDF tendonitis, with a minimum follow‐up period of 2 years after resumption of full work; and to determine whether reinjury rate was related to sports discipline and whether fibre alignment score (FAS) at 4 months could predict outcome. Methods : In Study 1, 50 horses were managed by controlled exercise alone ( Group A ), 50 were treated with intralesional injection of hyaluronan ( Group B ), 20 received intralesional and systemic treatment with PSGAG ( Group Ci ) and 30 received systemic treatment with PSGAG ( Group Cii ). Horses in Groups B, Ci and Cii followed the same controlled exercise programme as Group A. In Study 2 , 69 horses ( Group D ) were treated by intralesional injection of BAPN and followed a modified controlled exercise programme. Horses were re‐examined clinically and ultrasonographically at intervals. Follow‐up data were obtained for horses 2 years after resuming full work and for up to 6 years. Results : There was no significant difference in reinjury rate of the treated limb(s) between Groups A, B, Ci and Cii (42.5‐44.4%) (P>0.9). The reinjury rate (16%) in the treated limb(s) in Group D was significantly lower than in the other groups (P<0.001). However, when injury rate of the uninjured limb was considered, the results were similar to Study 1. In Study 2 , the FAS at 4 months after treatment was a good predictor of outcome (P<0.001). Reinjury rates for different disciplines were similar in the 2 studies, with the risk of reinjury ascending from showjumpers to event horses to National Hunt and flat racehorses. Conclusions : Treatment with BAPN reduced the risk of reinjury in the treated limb, although the overall rate of subsequent injury was not affected. FAS at 4 months after treatment is a good predictor of outcome in the treated limb(s). Potential relevance : This study provides long‐term follow‐up data in horses from a variety of sports disciplines that can be used to provide prognostic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2746/0425164044868422

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
DYSON, S. J.
Venue
Equine Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
415-419
ISSN
  • 0425-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-3306
OpenAlex
W2025589346
Cited by
254
References
6
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical management of superficial digital flexor tendonitis: a comparative study in 219 horses (1992‐2000). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2746/0425164044868422
The paper
DYSON, S. J. (2004). Medical management of superficial digital flexor tendonitis: a comparative study in 219 horses (1992‐2000). Equine Veterinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.2746/0425164044868422

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.