The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Empathy with Animals and with Humans: Are They Linked?
Abstract
A sample of 514 adults completed a postal questionnaire measuring both their empathy with humans (using the Mehrabian and Epstein (1972) Questionnaire for the Measurement of Emotional Empathy) and their empathy with non-human animals (using the Animal Empathy Scale, developed for this study). There was a significant, but modest correlation between the two scales (Kendall's tau=0.26, p<0.001), indicating that although the two types of empathy measure are in some way linked, they are unlikely to tap a single, unitary construct. This conclusion is reinforced by the finding that human- and animal-oriented empathy exhibit different levels of association with different potential sources of variation. Animal-oriented empathy was related to the current ownership of pets (U=19825.5, p<0.0001) and to the ownership of pets during childhood (U= 10271.0, p<0.01), while human-oriented empathy was related to currently having a child or children at home (U= 21020.5, p<0.05).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that anthropomorphism is a key aspect in the formation of the human–animal bond and the practice of pet keeping, since it allows people to identify and address the needs and the psychological states of animals in a context of reciprocal beneficial interaction [149,214].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [149]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Arluke A., 1996, Regarding Animals.
- Arluke A., 1992, Anthrozoös, 5, 6, 10.2752/089279392787011638 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011421 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167296225005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02131.x · DOI
- 10.1080/09585189608409914 · DOI
- Blum L.A., 1980, Friendship, Altruism and Morality.
- Bryant B.K., 1982, Child Development, 53, 413, 10.2307/1128984 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00302.x · DOI
- Eisenberg N., 1988, Anthrozoös, 2, 15, 10.2752/089279389787058226 · DOI
- Eisenberg N., 1995, In The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology, 203
- Eisenberg N., 1993, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 131, 10.1006/jecp.1993.1007 · DOI
- 10.2307/1131348 · DOI
- Eisenberg N., 1994, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 776, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100 · DOI
- 10.2307/1131287 · DOI
- Finch P., 1989, In The Status of Animals: Ethics, Education and Welfare, 64
- General Register Office for Scotland, 1991, Census 1991 Scotland: Report for Scotland.
- 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.121 · DOI
- Holzebeling F., 1994, Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 25, 155
- 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00290-9 · DOI
- Koestner R., 1990, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 709, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.709 · DOI
- Lennon R., 1987, In Empathy and its Development, 195
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.234 · DOI · Paper page
- Lockwood R., 1983, In New Perspectives on Our Lives with Companion Animals, 64
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x · DOI · Paper page
- Messent P.R., 1983, In New Perspectives on Our Lives with Companion Animals, 37
- 10.1023/A:1024430532155 · DOI
- Paton W., 1993, Man and Mouse: Animals in Medical Research.
- Paul E.S., 1995, Society and Animals, 3, 1, 10.1163/156853095X00017 · DOI
- Paul E.S., 2000, In Companion Animals and Us: Exploring the Relationships Between People and Pets, 168
- Paul E.S., 1993, Animal Welfare, 2, 321, 10.1017/S0962728600016109 · DOI
- Rossbach K.A., 1992, Anthrozoös, 5, 40, 10.2752/089279392787011593 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1192 · DOI
- Serpell J.A., 1996, In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships.
- Serpell J.A., 1994, In Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, 127
- 10.1080/016502597385199 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.118 · DOI
- Wispé L., 1987, In Empathy and its Development, 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234 · Cited by 904
“This also applies to the studies by Paul (2000) or Daly and Morton (2003, 2006, 2009).”
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
The human and animal baby schema effect: correlates of individual differences.
Lehmann, V., Huis in‘t Veld, E. M. J., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2013) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 194-202
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review