The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empathy and Belief in the Mental Experience of Animals
Abstract
Aspects of empathy are examined, including the relationship between empathy and perceived similarity or identification. Cognitive judgments of similarity appear to predispose us to the experience of empathy. An important aspect of similarity where animals are concerned is their perceived mental endowment (Fenton & Hills 1988). Therefore, a positive relationship was hypothesized between empathy for animals and “belief in animal mind” (i.e., beliefs about the extent to which animals have awareness, thoughts, and feelings). In a sample comprising three groups (animal rights supporters, farmers, and urban public) the expected relationship was found, r(153) = .47, p < .001; however, it was not consistent across the subject groups. Analysis suggested that the relationship between perceived similarity and empathy is mediated by conflicting instrumental motivations. Implications of the results for humane and environmental education are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Belief in the animal mind is a good predictor of attitudes towards animals and their use and abuse for human benefit.
“Belief in the animal mind appears to be a good predictor of attitudes towards animals and their use and abuse for the benefit of humans (e.g., entertainment, experimentation and financial gain [60,61]).”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people's attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for.
“These factors appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people’s attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for [12,13,27,60,61].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.2752/089279389787058091 · DOI
- Batson C.D., 1981, Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives, 167
- 10.1163/156853093X00037 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752 · DOI
- Darwin C., 1989, The works of Charles Darwin, 21
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00860.x · DOI
- Dovidio, J.F. 1984. Helping behavior and altruism: An empirical and conceptual overview. In L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17: 361–427). New York: Academic Press. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
- Eisenberg N., 1988, Anthrozoös, 2, 15, 10.2752/089279389787058226 · DOI
- Eisenberg, N., and J. Strayer, eds. 1987. Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 10.1080/00050068808255608 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
- Hills, A.M. 1991. The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals, and their relationship to attitude structure and dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Western Australia.
- Hoffman, M.L. 1984. Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In W.M. Kurtines and J.L. Gewirtz, eds. Morality, moral behavior, and moral development , 283–302. New York: John Wiley.
- Hoffman, M.L. 1987. The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer, eds. Empathy and its development , 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hornstein, H.A. 1976. Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Howard W.E., 1984, Transactions of The 49th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 49, 469
- Hume, D. 1963. Enquiries concerning the human understanding and concerning the principles of morals , L.A. Selby-Bigge, ed. London: Oxford University Press. [Original work published 1777]
- Kellert, S.R. 1980. Contemporary values of wildlife in American society. In W.W. Shaw and E.H. Zube, eds. Wildlife Values , pp. 31–60. University of Arizona, Tucson: Center for Assessment of Noncommodity Natural Resource Values, Institutional Series Report Number 1.
- Leventhal, H. 1984. A perceptual-motor theory of emotion. In L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology , Vol. 17, pp. 117–182. New York: Academic Press. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x · DOI · Paper page
- Midgley, M. 1983. Animals and why they matter. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
- Naess, A. 1984. Identification as a source of deep ecological attitudes. In M. Tobias, ed. Deep ecology , pp. 256–270. San Diego, CA: Avant Books.
- 10.1080/00958964.1990.9943043 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x · DOI
- Opotow S., 1990, Journal of Social Issues, 46, 120
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00907.x · DOI · Paper page
- Staub, E. 1987. Commentary on Part I. In N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer, eds. Empathy and its development , pp. 103–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Makecha, R. N., Phalke, S., & Nakai, Y. (2022) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2021.1902812 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Hills, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027.
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 132-142
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review