The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare
Abstract
A total of 833 students completed a four-part questionnaire which measured demographic factors (sex, education, vegetarianism, religiousness), attitudes to animal experimentation, personality (Big Five) and empathy. Attitudes to animal experimentation factored into five interpretable factors, and multiple regression analyses were used to examine the extent to which demographic factors, personality and empathy predicted these. Sex, vegetarianism, Agreeableness, Openness, Extraversion and empathy were significant predictors of all these factors. Results showed an interpretable set of correlates that were similar to previous studies in the area. As with previous research findings, the measures used predicted only a small amount of variance with respect to attitudes to animals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies on companion and farm animals show that the way in which animals are considered, treated and cared for is strongly affected by peoples’ characteristics such as personality, attitudes, empathy and attachment levels and beliefs in animals’ mental capacities (e.g., [26,27]).”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Personality has been associated with positive attitudes to animals, and there is a relationship between psychopathic personality traits and animal abuse and violence [26,35,36].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Archer J., 1986, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 39, 361
- Armstrong J., 1996, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1003, 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.1003 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853093X00037 · DOI
- Coilee D., 1984, American Psychologist, 39, 700, 10.1037/0003-066X.39.6.700 · DOI
- Costa P., 1989, The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual Supplement.
- Devenport L., 1990, Psychological Science, 1, 215, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00202.x · DOI
- Feeney D., 1987, American Psychologist, 42, 593, 10.1037/0003-066X.42.6.593 · DOI
- Furnham A., 1999, Personality and Social Behaviour.
- 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90036-3 · DOI
- Furnham A., 1990, Psychologist, 10, 444
- Gallup G., 1985, American Psychologist, 40, 1104, 10.1037/0003-066X.40.10.1104 · DOI
- Gray J., 1987, Psychology Survey, 6, 241
- Gunter B., 1999, Pets and People: The Psychology of Pet Ownership.
- 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
- Hills A., 1998, Anthrozoös, 11, 142, 10.2752/089279398787000616 · DOI
- Hutchins M., 1994, The College Student Journal, 28, 258
- Martasian P., 1997, Psychological Reports, 81, 803, 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.3.803 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853097X00060 · DOI
- Miller N., 1985, American Psychologist, 40, 423, 10.1037/0003-066X.40.4.423 · DOI
- Plous S., 1991, Psychological Science, 2, 194, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1167 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.131 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1583 · Cited by 499
Self-citationPrato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
The human and animal baby schema effect: correlates of individual differences.
Lehmann, V., Huis in‘t Veld, E. M. J., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2013) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Furnham, A., McManus, C., & Scott, D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University College London, UK
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
