Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Companion Animals as Selfobjects

Brown, Sue-Ellen·2007·Anthrozoös

Abstract

This research examined whether self psychology could be systematically applied to human–animal relationships. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted, which consisted of 16 questions designed to illuminate selfobject needs. The interviews were intended to identify whether the horse/dog/cat/rabbit was a selfobject, that is, a provider of self-cohesion, self esteem, calmness, soothing, and acceptance, for the participant and, if so, whether the primary type(s) of selfobject was mirroring, idealizing, or twinship. Results revealed that self psychology could be applied successfully to human–animal relationships, that it could usually be determined whether the animal served a selfobject function, and that selfobject type was generally able to be established. In this sample, animals rivaled and even surpassed humans in their ability to provide important selfobject needs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/089279307x245654

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alper L.S., 1993, The Widening Scope of Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, 9, 257
  2. Bacal, H.A. and Newman, K. 1990.Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology.New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Brown S.E., 2004, Society & Animals, 12, 67, 10.1163/156853004323029540 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brown S.E., 1997, DISSOCIATION, 10, 125
  5. Brown S.E., 2001, Society & Animals, 9, 25, 10.1163/156853001300108973 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kohut, H. 1984.How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  7. Silverstein, M.L. 1999.Self Psychology and Diagnostic Assessment: Identifying Selfobject Functions through Psychological Testing.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. · DOI
  8. Wolf, E.S. 1988.Treating the Self: Elements of Clinical Self Psychology.New York: The Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, S.-E.
Affiliations
Center for the Study of Human-Animal Interdependent Relationships, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2007-12
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
329-343
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review