The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Romantic Partners and Four-Legged Friends: An Extension of Attachment Theory to Relationships with Pets
Abstract
The founding principle of attachment theory (Bowlby 1973) is that a secure attachment to a caregiver is one of the first and most basic needs in an infant's life. Through the decades attachment theory has expanded its scope to include central adult relationships, especially between romantic partners, and has provided a useful framework for exploring relationships with friends and family members. We seek to further extend the application of the standard model of adult attachment to another interaction that people value: relationships with pets. We compared participants' reports of their relationships with pets and relationships with romantic partners in a web-based survey of 192 pet owners. Our adaptations of measures originally designed to measure insecurity in human relationships—the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ; Bartholomew and Horowitz 1991) and the Avoidance and Anxiety scales from the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R; Fraley, Waller and Brennan 2000)—produced reliable measures of relationships with pets. The structure of dimensions of insecurity was similar for pet and partner relationships, but ratings of pet relationships correlated little or not at all with ratings of partner relationships. Surprisingly, relationships with pets were more secure on every measure. Our results provide initial evidence that attachment measures are indeed useful tools for investigating people's relationships with their pets. It appears that pets are a consi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functional levels of empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism may promote people's concern for animal welfare in general and foster healthy human-animal relationships.
“Functional levels of empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism may promote people’s concern for animal welfare in general and foster healthy human–animal relationships [103,104,105,106].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [105]
The nature and structure of human-animal attachment appears similar to interpersonal attachment, with a significant association between security and insecurity in human-animal and interpersonal human relationships.
“The nature and structure of human–animal attachment appears to be similar to interpersonal attachment, with a significant association between security and insecurity in human–animal and interpersonal human relationships [105,198].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cites
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601 · cited 3×
“Yet a relationship need not be a true attachment in order to serve “attachment-related” functions (Fraley and Shaver 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialHarry, F., & Harlow, M. K. (1962) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1162-136 · Cited by 679
Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00165-x · Cited by 285
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.2307/352019 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01269.x · DOI
- Barker S.B., 1988, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 10, 46
- 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
- Bonas S., 2000, Companion Animals & Us, 209
- 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.285 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279306785593757 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350 · DOI · Paper page
- Hazan C., 1999, Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 336
- 10.2752/089279392787011395 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0167.49.4.460 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1205 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.419 · DOI
- Sable P., 1995, Social Work, 40, 334
- 10.1177/0146167205276865 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.295 · DOI
- Trinke S.J., 1997, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603, 10.1177/0265407597145002 · DOI
- Vaughn B.E., 1999, Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications, 198
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Kogan, L. R., Currin-McCulloch, J., Bussolari, C., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11072084 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, L., & Madresh, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania, USA
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-56
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review