Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Romantic Partners and Four-Legged Friends: An Extension of Attachment Theory to Relationships with Pets

Beck, Lisa, Madresh, Elizabeth A.·2008·Anthrozoös

Abstract

The founding principle of attachment theory (Bowlby 1973) is that a secure attachment to a caregiver is one of the first and most basic needs in an infant's life. Through the decades attachment theory has expanded its scope to include central adult relationships, especially between romantic partners, and has provided a useful framework for exploring relationships with friends and family members. We seek to further extend the application of the standard model of adult attachment to another interaction that people value: relationships with pets. We compared participants' reports of their relationships with pets and relationships with romantic partners in a web-based survey of 192 pet owners. Our adaptations of measures originally designed to measure insecurity in human relationships—the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ; Bartholomew and Horowitz 1991) and the Avoidance and Anxiety scales from the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R; Fraley, Waller and Brennan 2000)—produced reliable measures of relationships with pets. The structure of dimensions of insecurity was similar for pet and partner relationships, but ratings of pet relationships correlated little or not at all with ratings of partner relationships. Surprisingly, relationships with pets were more secure on every measure. Our results provide initial evidence that attachment measures are indeed useful tools for investigating people's relationships with their pets. It appears that pets are a consi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/089279308x274056

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.2307/352019 · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01269.x · DOI
  3. Barker S.B., 1988, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 10, 46
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bonas S., 2000, Companion Animals & Us, 209
  6. 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.285 · DOI
  8. 10.2752/089279306785593757 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hazan C., 1999, Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 336
  11. 10.2752/089279392787011395 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-0167.49.4.460 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1205 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.419 · DOI
  16. Sable P., 1995, Social Work, 40, 334
  17. 10.1177/0146167205276865 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.295 · DOI
  20. Trinke S.J., 1997, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603, 10.1177/0265407597145002 · DOI
  21. Vaughn B.E., 1999, Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications, 198

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beck, L., & Madresh, E. A.
Affiliations
Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania, USA
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2008-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
43-56
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
189
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review