Cited by 4Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal and Plant Science EducationConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Assessing the Effects of a Cognition-Based Education Program on Attitudes of Villagers Toward Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Conflict-Prone Areas

Makecha, Radhika N., Phalke, Sagarika, Nakai, Yoshie·2022·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

A vital role in mitigating human-elephant conflict (HEC) involves conservation education programs in local communities. It is therefore important to assess the types of information that make conservation education programs effective. Given the public's fascination with animal minds, the elephant being a cognitively complex species, and the high occurrence of HEC surrounding Asian elephants, the current research assessed whether using information on elephant cognition in a conservation education program increased positive attitudes toward elephants/elephant conservation in Bannerghatta National Park (BNP). BNP, located in Karnataka, India, is an area reporting high HEC. Results indicated no significant difference in adult male villagers' attitudes toward elephants/elephant conservation when exposed to one of two educational programs, one of which included information on elephant cognition. However, a significant difference in attitudes between the two programs and a control group was discovered, suggesting the importance of an educational intervention in the communities surrounding BNP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10888705.2021.1902812

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Makecha et al. (2022) found that cognition-based and non-cognition-based educational programs both had similar positive effects on attitudes towards elephants, compared with a control.

    “They found that cognition-based and non-cognition-based programs both had similar positive effects on attitudes towards elephants, compared with a control.”
  • The Makecha et al. (2022) study suggests that there are benefits of educational programs that could lead to more favorable attitudes toward elephants.

    “However, their study still suggests that there are benefits of such educational programs that could lead to more favorable attitudes toward elephants.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makecha, R. N., Phalke, S., & Nakai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Kentucky University (US)
  • A Rocha India, Karnataka, Bilwaradahalli, India
Corresponding author
Makecha, Radhika N.
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
368-381
ISSN
  • 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7604
OpenAlex
W3148989670
Cited by
4
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eastern Kentucky University
  • University Funded Scholarship Program (#18-103)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
human-elephant conflict, Asian elephant, conservation education, elephant conservation, community-based conservation, educational intervention
MeSH terms
Animals, Attitude, Cognition, Conservation of Natural Resources, Elephants, Humans, India, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review