Cited by 59Social Media and PoliticsPolitical Theory and DemocracyCultural Studies and Postmodernism

Cyber-Libertarianism 2.0: A Discourse Theory/Critical Political Economy Examination

Dahlberg, Lincoln·2010·Cultural Politics

Abstract

Cyber-libertarian discourse has recently made a “come-back” in popular technology and academic discussions about the democratic potential of “Web 2.0.” here, becoming a digital citizen means becoming an autonomous and creative “do-it-yourself citizen-consumer.” This paper identifies some of the limits of this “cyber-libertarian 2.0” discourse. It does so first by drawing upon post-Marxist discourse theory to outline the central elements of the discourse, and second by contrasting the cyber-libertarian understanding of “the situation” with a critical political economy reading that draws upon Debord's theory of “the spectacle.” The comparative analysis is structured by way of the normative categories “liberty,” “equality,” and “the demos,” which both discourses embrace in different ways when speaking of digitally enabled democracy. The critical political economy reading identifies a range of factors limiting the extension of democracy through Web 2.0, factors that are not taken into account by the cyber-libertarian discourse. Identifying such factors provides a starting point for a critical exploration of how democracy can be extended through the Internet. In conclusion, lines for such exploration are suggested, specifically in relation to a radical conception of democracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175174310x12750685679753

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reality of openness is problematic both in terms of overall participation, dropout rates, and quality of experience.

    “Despite the promise of openness-online work where anyone can, in theory, participate-the reality is problematic both in terms of overall participation, dropout rates, and quality of experience [19, 25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahlberg, L.
Corresponding author
Dahlberg, Lincoln
Venue
Cultural Politics
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
331-356
ISSN
  • 1743-2197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7435
OpenAlex
W2164213789
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cultural Politics an International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
Keywords
Web 2.0, digital democracy, digital citizenship, critical political economy, Guy Debord, freedom, equality, the demos, radical democracy, internet and democracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review