Cited by 111Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Treatment of Substance Dependence

Wesley, Martin C., Minatrea, Neresa B., Watson, Joshua C.·2009·Anthrozoös

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) on the therapeutic alliance with an adult, residential, substance abuse population in group therapy. We used randomized samples and controlled conditions to establish the effects of chosen variables that influence outcome. A total of 231 people took part in the study (control group [without therapy dog]: n = 96; experimental group [with therapy dog]: n = 135) in which there were 26 group sessions. The results of the study indicate that, overall, the therapeutic alliance is enhanced with the addition of a therapy dog: the AAT group had a more positive opinion of the therapeutic alliance, as measured using the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ-II), than the control group (ANOVA: F(1,229) = 25.44, p < 0.001). Clients seeking treatment for a dual diagnosis, clients with state social service involvement, and clients seeking treatment for alcohol addiction had similar opinions of the therapeutic alliance, whether in the experimental group or the control group. Males, females, pet owners, court ordered clients, and clients seeking treatment for polysubstance, cannabis, and methamphetamine dependence all were more positive about the therapeutic alliance if they were in the experimental group than if they were in the control. This study demonstrates that addiction professionals could increase treatment success by adding this complementary, evidence-based practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303709x434167

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wesley, M. C., Minatrea, N. B., & Watson, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Lindsey Wilson College (US)
  • Western Kentucky University (US)
  • Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wesley, Martin C.
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2009-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
137-148
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W2002605039
Cited by
111
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, therapy dogs, substance dependence, therapeutic relationship, group therapy, residential addiction treatment, Helping Alliance Questionnaire, dual diagnosis, alcoholism, cannabis use disorder, methamphetamine dependence, complementary therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review