The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts
Abstract
Social commerce has taken the e-tailing world by storm. Business-to-consumer sites and, more important, intermediaries that facilitate shopping experience, continue to offer more and more innovative technologies to support social interaction among like-minded community members or friends who share the same shopping interests. Among these technologies, reviews, ratings, and recommendation systems have become some of the most popular social shopping platforms due to their ease of use and simplicity in sharing buying experience and aggregating evaluations. This paper studies the effect of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) communication among a closed community of book readers. We studied the entire market of Amazon Shorts e-books, which are digital microproducts sold at a low and uniform price. With the minimal role of price in the buying decision, social discussion via eWOM becomes a collective signal of reputation, and ultimately a significant demand driver. Our empirical study suggests that eWOM can be used to convey the reputation of the product (e.g., the book), the reputation of the brand (i.e., the author), and the reputation of complementary goods (e.g., books in the same category). Until newer social shopping technologies gain acceptance, eWOM technologies should be considered by both e-tailers and shoppers as the first and perhaps primary source of social buying experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190
The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2 · Cited by 1,118
Disentangling the effects of social network density on electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) intention
Sohn, D. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01444.x · Cited by 98
Cited by
Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce
Liang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415160201 · Cited by 960
Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy
Hajli, N. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 · Cited by 826
Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review
Zhang, K. Z. K., & Benyoucef, M. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.001 · Cited by 631
Wang, W.-T., Wang, Y.-S., & Liu, E.-R. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.006 · Cited by 375
Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research
Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.005 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Amblee, N., & Bui, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-114
- ISSN
- 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9301
- OpenAlex
- W2066914810
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 49.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/jec1086-4415160205
- The paper
- Amblee, N., & Bui, T. (2011). Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415160205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.