Cited by 369Digital Marketing and Social MediaTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Innovation in Industries

Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research

Busalim, Abdelsalam H., Hussin, Ab Razak Che·2016·International Journal of Information Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.005

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C.
Affiliations
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Busalim, Abdelsalam H.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1075-1088
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2481426478
Cited by
369
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
social commerce, social media, Web 2.0, user behavior, business models, web design, technology adoption, social network analysis, firm performance, e-commerce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review