Cited by 119Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaReproductive tract infections researchBacterial Infections and Vaccines

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic relatedness of ceftriaxone-resistant and high-level azithromycin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae cases, United Kingdom and Australia, February to April 2018

Open access

Abstract

Between February and April 2018, three ceftriaxone-resistant and high-level azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae cases were identified; one in the United Kingdom and two in Australia. Whole genome sequencing was used to show that the isolates from these cases belong to a single gonococcal clone, which we name the A2543 clone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.8.1900118

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure Phylogeny of United Kingdom and Australian sequences obtained in February–April 2018 and the most closely related existing Neisseria gonorrhoea genome sequences
Figure Phylogeny of United Kingdom and Australian sequences obtained in February–April 2018 and the most closely related existing Neisseria gonorrhoea genome sequencesCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jennison, A. V., Whiley, D., Lahra, M. M., Graham, R. M., Cole, M. J., Hughes, G., Fifer, H., Andersson, M., Edwards, A., & Eyre, D.
Affiliations
  • Queensland Health (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Eurosurveillance
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
24
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1025-496X (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-7917
OpenAlex
W2917634477
Cited by
114
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 8
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eurosurveillance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
Neisseria gonorrhoeae, ceftriaxone resistance, azithromycin resistance, genetic relatedness, whole genome sequencing, gonorrhea, antimicrobial resistance, United Kingdom, Australia
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Australia, Ceftriaxone, Genotype, Gonorrhea, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Phylogeny, Azithromycin, Sentinel Surveillance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review