Cited by 321COVID-19 epidemiological studiesTravel-related health issuesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

Open access
Quilty, Billy J, Clifford, Sam, CMMID nCoV working group2, Flasche, Stefan, Eggo, Rosalind M·2020·Eurosurveillance

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We evaluated effectiveness of thermal passenger screening for 2019-nCoV infection at airport exit and entry to inform public health decision-making. In our baseline scenario, we estimated that 46% (95% confidence interval: 36 to 58) of infected travellers would not be detected, depending on incubation period, sensitivity of exit and entry screening, and proportion of asymptomatic cases. Airport screening is unlikely to detect a sufficient proportion of 2019-nCoV infected travellers to avoid entry of infected travellers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.5.2000080

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Simulated infection histories of travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Figure 1 Simulated infection histories of travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Screenshot of Shiny appa displaying the number of travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) detected at airport exit and entry screening with baseline assumptionsb, 95% bootstrap confidence intervals, time distributions for incubation period and time to severe disease*
Figure 2 Screenshot of Shiny appa displaying the number of travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) detected at airport exit and entry screening with baseline assumptionsb, 95% bootstrap confidence intervals, time distributions for incubation period and time to severe disease*CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Probability of detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) at airport entry screening by travel duration and sensitivity of exit screening
Figure 3 Probability of detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) at airport entry screening by travel duration and sensitivity of exit screeningCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Quilty, B. J., Clifford, S., group2, C. N. W., Flasche, S., & Eggo, R. M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Quilty, Billy J
Venue
Eurosurveillance
Published
2020-02-06
Volume
25
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1025-496X (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-7917
OpenAlex
W3005151538
Cited by
321
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 144
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eurosurveillance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (206250, 210758/Z/18/Z, 206250/Z/17/Z, Z/17/Z, 208812, 03010, 210758, 208812/Z/17/Z)
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ITCRZ 03010, 16/137/109, 16/137/10)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (ITCRZ 03010)
  • Royal Society (208812, Z/17/Z, 206250/Z/17/Z, 208812/Z/17/Z)
  • Research Councils UK (MR/S003975/1, ES/P010873/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S003975/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P010873/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, airport security screening, thermal screening, infection detection, asymptomatic infection, incubation period, screening sensitivity, public health decision-making
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Body Temperature, Decision Making, Fever, Humans, Mass Screening, Models, Theoretical, Pneumonia, Viral, Population Surveillance, Public Health, Coronavirus Infections, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Air Travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review