The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kritik der praktischen Vernunft
Open accessAbstract
Includes indexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03425 · Cited by 1,907
A guide to community sustainability indicators
Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(00)00049-4 · Cited by 477
Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning
Stahl, B. C., Andreou, A., Brey, P., Hatzakis, T., Kirichenko, A., Macnish, K., Laulhé Shaelou, S., Patel, A., Ryan, M., & Wright, D. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.030 · Cited by 203
From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems
Stahl, B. C. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00080-1 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Immanuel, I.
- Venue
- Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks
- Publisher
- FELIX MEINER VERLAG
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W2073691011
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.28937/978-3-7873-2118-6
- The paper
- Immanuel, I. (2003). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks. https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2118-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
