Cited by 139Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesOnline Learning and Analytics

Informing and Performing: A Study Comparing Adaptive Learning to Traditional Learning

Open access
Coffin Murray, Meg, Pérez, Jorge·2015·Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline

Abstract

Technology has transformed education, perhaps most evidently in course delivery options. However, compelling questions remain about how technology impacts learning. Adaptive learning tools are technology-based artifacts that interact with learners and vary presentation based upon that interaction. This paper compares adaptive learning with a conventional teaching approach implemented in a digital literacy course. Current research explores the hypothesis that adapting instruction to an individual’s learning style results in better learning outcomes. Computer technology has long been seen as an answer to the scalability and cost of individualized instruction. Adaptive learning is touted as a potential game-changer in higher education, a panacea with which institutions may solve the riddle of the iron triangle: quality, cost and access. Though the research is scant, this study and a few others like it indicate that today’s adaptive learning systems have negligible impact on learning outcomes, one aspect of quality. Clearly, more research like this study, some of it from the perspective of adaptive learning systems as informing systems, is needed before the far-reaching promise of advanced learning systems can be realized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.28945/2165

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47-63). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  2. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
  3. Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 159-172.
  4. Cohen, E. (2009). A philosophy of informing science. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, 1-15. Available from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol12/ISJv12p001- 015Cohen399.pdf
  5. Cronbach, L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12(11), 671- 684. Available from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Cronbach/Disciplines/
  6. Cronbach, L. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30(2), 116-127.
  7. Esichaikul, V., Lamnoi, S., & Bechter, C. (2011). Student modeling in adaptive e-learning systems. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3), 342-355. Available from http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/viewFile/124/102
  8. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In Student learning styles -Diagnosing and prescrib- ing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
  9. Lee, J., & Park, O. (2008). Adaptive instructional systems. In J. M Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Mer- rienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technol- ogy (3rd ed., pp. 469-484). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  10. Magoulas, G. D., Papanikolaou, K. A., & Grigoriadou, M. (1999). Towards a computationally intelligent lesson adaption for a distance learning course. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.
  11. McGraw-Hill Education. (2015) LearnSmart Advantage. Available from http://learnsmartadvantage.com
  12. Wauters, K., Desmet, P., & Van den Noorgate, W. (2010). Adaptive item-based learning environments based on the item response theory: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learn- ing, 26, 549-562.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coffin Murray, M., & Pérez, J.
Affiliations
  • Kennesaw State University
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
Venue
Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline
Published
2015
Volume
18
Pages
111-125
ISSN
  • 1535-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-9684
  • 1521-4672
OpenAlex
W2130700601
Cited by
139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Informing Science and IT Education Conference (publishedVersion)
  • Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
adaptive learning, traditional teaching methods, digital literacy, learning outcomes, personalized learning, learning styles, higher education, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review