Cited by 345Advanced MIMO Systems OptimizationAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling

A Deep Learning Framework for Optimization of MISO Downlink Beamforming

Open access
Xia, Wenchao, Zheng, Gan, Zhu, Yongxu, Zhang, Jun, Wang, Jiangzhou, Petropulu, Athina P.·2020·IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract

Beamforming is an effective means to improve the quality of the received signals in multiuser multiple-input-single-output (MISO) systems. Traditionally, finding the optimal beamforming solution relies on iterative algorithms, which introduces high computational delay and is thus not suitable for real-time implementation. In this paper, we propose a deep learning framework for the optimization of downlink beamforming. In particular, the solution is obtained based on convolutional neural networks and exploitation of expert knowledge, such as the uplink-downlink duality and the known structure of optimal solutions. Using this framework, we construct three beamforming neural networks (BNNs) for three typical optimization problems, i.e., the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) balancing problem, the power minimization problem, and the sum rate maximization problem. For the former two problems the BNNs adopt the supervised learning approach, while for the sum rate maximization problem a hybrid method of supervised and unsupervised learning is employed. Simulation results show that the BNNs can achieve near-optimal solutions to the SINR balancing and power minimization problems, and a performance close to that of the weighted minimum mean squared error algorithm for the sum rate maximization problem, while in all cases enjoy significantly reduced computational complexity. In summary, this work paves the way for fast realization of optimal beamforming in multiuser MISO systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcomm.2019.2960361

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum channels can have different possibilities in delivering information including quantum information, entanglement-assisted classical information, and private classical information.

    “This is due to the reason that quantum channels can have different possibilities in terms of delivering information including quantum information, entanglement-assisted classical information [123] and private classical information [124].”

    From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Introduction (p. 1) discusses deep learning for wireless physical-layer communications, and the framework section (p. 4) discusses complex channel coefficients. Searches for entanglement-assisted classical information and quantum channels found no passage addressing the cited claim about quantum-channel information types. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. grant, 2014, CVX Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming Version 2 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, W., Zheng, G., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Petropulu, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • London South Bank University (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2020-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
1866-1880
ISSN
  • 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0857
OpenAlex
W2908498346
Cited by
345
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 5
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871446, 61671251, U1805262, 61404130218)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N007840/1)
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2017-129)
  • National Science Foundation (CCF-1526908)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Keywords
convolutional neural networks, SINR balancing, power minimization, sum rate maximization, uplink-downlink duality, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, computational complexity reduction, real-time beamforming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review