Disturbing Behaviours: Ole Ivar Lovaas and the Queer History of Autism Science
Open accessAbstract
This paper “queers” the history of autism science through an examination of the overlap between the regulation of autism with that of gender and sexuality in the work of Ole Ivar Lovaas. Lovaas is the founder of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA), the most commonly used and funded autism intervention today that seeks to extinguish autistic behaviors, primarily among children. Less commonly recognized is Lovaas’ involvement in the Feminine Boy Project, where he developed interventions into the gender identities and behaviors of young people. Turning to Lovaas’ published works, we perform a “history of the present” and argue that a queer disability studies lens opens up the richness of autism as a cultural nexus, and deepens understandings of intersecting and contested histories of science, professional scopes of practice, and dominant futurities. The article makes a significant and timely contribution to understanding the disabling material effects of autism science in the lives of autistic persons. In particular, this case study highlights the need for feminist science studies to further investigate the historical and contemporary links between dominant scientific constructions of disability, gender, and sexuality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This study and Lovaas's approach to behavioral intervention have been widely criticized in the decades since.
“Though this study and Lovaas’s approach to behavioral intervention have been widely criticized in the decades since (e.g. Gibson & Douglas, 2018; Kirkham, 2017), this investigation was the beginning of the now widespread field of applied behavior analysis (ABA), which remains one of the most widely used interventions for skill acquisition and reduction of harmful behavior for Autistic individuals”
From Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Gibson & Douglas, 2018
Cites
Kafer, A. (2013) · doi:10.2979/6841.0 · Cited by 2,131 · see citing works
SOME GENERALIZATION AND FOLLOW‐UP MEASURES ON AUTISTIC CHILDREN IN BEHAVIOR THERAPY <sup>1</sup>
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-131 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure
Clare, E. (2017) · doi:10.1215/9780822373520 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schuck, R. K., Tagavi, D. M., Baiden, K. M. P., Dwyer, P., Williams, Z. J., Osuna, A., Ferguson, E. F., Jimenez Muñoz, M., Poyser, S. K., Johnson, J. F., et al. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gibson, M. F., & Douglas, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Brandon University (CA)
- Venue
- Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
- Published
- 2018-10-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897631587
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- history of autism, applied behaviour analysis, gender identity, sexuality, autism intervention, history of the present, feminist science studies, autistic people
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review