Cited by 55Disability Rights and RepresentationGender and Feminist StudiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Disturbing Behaviours: Ole Ivar Lovaas and the Queer History of Autism Science

Open access
Gibson, Margaret F., Douglas, Patty·2018·Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience

Abstract

This paper “queers” the history of autism science through an examination of the overlap between the regulation of autism with that of gender and sexuality in the work of Ole Ivar Lovaas. Lovaas is the founder of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA), the most commonly used and funded autism intervention today that seeks to extinguish autistic behaviors, primarily among children. Less commonly recognized is Lovaas’ involvement in the Feminine Boy Project, where he developed interventions into the gender identities and behaviors of young people. Turning to Lovaas’ published works, we perform a “history of the present” and argue that a queer disability studies lens opens up the richness of autism as a cultural nexus, and deepens understandings of intersecting and contested histories of science, professional scopes of practice, and dominant futurities. The article makes a significant and timely contribution to understanding the disabling material effects of autism science in the lives of autistic persons. In particular, this case study highlights the need for feminist science studies to further investigate the historical and contemporary links between dominant scientific constructions of disability, gender, and sexuality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.28968/cftt.v4i2.29579

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study and Lovaas's approach to behavioral intervention have been widely criticized in the decades since.

    “Though this study and Lovaas’s approach to behavioral intervention have been widely criticized in the decades since (e.g. Gibson & Douglas, 2018; Kirkham, 2017), this investigation was the beginning of the now widespread field of applied behavior analysis (ABA), which remains one of the most widely used interventions for skill acquisition and reduction of harmful behavior for Autistic individuals”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, M. F., & Douglas, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Brandon University (CA)
Venue
Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
Published
2018-10-16
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
1-28
ISSN
2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897631587
Cited by
55
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
history of autism, applied behaviour analysis, gender identity, sexuality, autism intervention, history of the present, feminist science studies, autistic people

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review