Cited by 47Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthWomen's cancer prevention and management

Effect of peer education on knowledge of human papilloma virus and cervical cancer among female adolescent students in Benin city, Nigeria

Open access
Sadoh, Ayebo Evawere, Okonkwobo, Chukwunwendu, Nwaneri, Damian Uchechukwu, Ogboghodo, Bamidele Charity, Eregiea, Charles, Oviawe, Osawaru, Famuyiwa, Omolara·2018·Annals of Global Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is well documented that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) is the cause of cervical cancer which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality especially in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccines against HPV are available. In developed countries where the vaccines have been deployed, lack of information among the target population (adolescents) is a major contributor to suboptimal uptake. In Nigeria, the vaccine is yet to be provided in the national programme on immunization, which is free, but it is available for a fee. In this study we determined the effect of peer education on the knowledge of female adolescents about HPV, cervical cancer, its treatment and prevention. METHODS: This was an intervention study. The knowledge and awareness of female students of four secondary schools were assessed using a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire prior to the training of some of the students (peers). The trained students delivered messages on cervical cancer and HPV using fliers containing key information (peer training) to their school mates in formal delivery in a class setting. The knowledge and awareness of students, post-peer training, was then assessed. RESULTS: There were 1337 students who responded to the baseline questionnaire while 1201 responded to the post-peer training questionnaire. Awareness of cervical cancer, knowledge of risk factors and cause of cervical cancer was low prior to the peer training. There was statistically significant improvement in awareness about cervical cancer and in the knowledge domains following peer training. Mean knowledge score prior to training was 12.94 ± 9.23 and this increased significantly to 53.74 ± 10.69 following peer training p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Peer training is effective in improving knowledge and awareness of secondary school students about HPV and cervical cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29024/aogh.24

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kenya and Uganda deployed mobile vaccination camps to reach remote and rural populations, ensuring greater coverage among out-of-school adolescents.

    “In Kenya and Uganda, mobile vaccination camps have been deployed to reach remote and rural populations, ensuring greater coverage among out-of-school adolescents58,59.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction discusses HPV vaccine access in Nigeria, and the Discussion reports peer education among students in Benin City; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. Searches for Kenya, Uganda, mobile vaccination camps, and out-of-school coverage found no passage addressing the claimed deployments or their effects. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Oanda I and Akudolu L. Addressing gender inequality in higher education through targeted institutional responses: field evidence from Kenya and Nigeria In: O’Hara S (ed.), Higher education in Africa; equity, access opportunity. New York: Institute of International education (IIE).
  2. [18]Fasanu AO, Akindele RA, Adebimpe WA, et al. Knowledge of risk factors and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among health care workers in a teaching hospital in south western Nigeria. Int J Med Med Sci. 2014; 4: 172– 77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadoh, A. E., Okonkwobo, C., Nwaneri, D. U., Ogboghodo, B. C., Eregiea, C., Oviawe, O., & Famuyiwa, O.
Affiliations
University of Benin (NG)
Corresponding author
Sadoh, Ayebo Evawere
Venue
Annals of Global Health
Published
2018-04-30
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
121
ISSN
2214-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800708710
Cited by
47
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
peer education, human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, adolescent girls, health knowledge, HPV vaccination, cervical cancer prevention, high school students, health awareness, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nigeria, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, School Health Services, Students, Vaccination, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review