The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a generic approach to the safety assessment by EFSA of microorganisms used in food/feed and the production of food/feed additives: Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a generic approach to the safety assessment by EFSA of microorganisms used in fo
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the recent EFSA document, the requirements to be included in the ‘‘Qualified Presumption of Safety’’ (QPS) group include a lack of pathogenicity and the absence of acquired resistance genes [42].”
From Profiling the resistome and virulome of Bacillus strains used for probiotic-based sanitation: a multicenter WGS analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This may be the reason why yeasts sensu lato are generally regarded as safe and therefore applying yeasts in crops and on food products elicits less concern than applications of bacteria or filamentous fungi (European Food Safety Authority 2005).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as European Food Safety Authority 2005
Citations
Cites
European Commission 2003 On a generic approach to the safety assessment of microorganisms used in feed/food and feed/food production europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out178_en.pdf
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 1 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–122 of 122
Microbial biotechnology in food and health: present and future food safety regulation
Bari, M. L., & Zaman, S. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819813-1.00001-3 · Cited by 4
Novel Starter Strain Enterococcus faecium DMEA09 from Traditional Korean Fermented Meju
Oh, S.-E., Heo, S., Lee, G., Park, H.-J., & Jeong, D. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12163008 · Cited by 4
Fernandes, A., Tungare, K., Jathar, S., Kunal, S. P., Jha, P., Desai, N. S., & Jobby, R. (2023) · Food Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/08905436.2023.2268701 · Cited by 4
Agraib, L. M., Yamani, M. I., Rayyan, Y. M., Sneineh, A. T. A., Tamimi, T., & Tayyem, R. (2021) · Drug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy · doi:10.1515/dmdi-2021-0150 · Cited by 19
Arjmand, M. M. (2019) · Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering · doi:10.34172/ajehe.2019.16 · Cited by 3
In Vitro Study of Immune Properties of New Lactobacilli Isolates from Pheasant Gut
Karaffová, V., Révajová, V., Nemcová, R., Ševčíková, Z., Levkutova, M., & Levkut, M. (2020) · Folia veterinaria · doi:10.2478/fv-2020-0006 · Cited by 3
Enzymes in the Design of Functional Foods or Their Constituents
Bhat, S. G., & D’Rose, V. (2018) · Energy, environment, and sustainability · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3263-0_20 · Cited by 2
Khullar, G., Nayem, M. F., Kanyakam, K., Thanyasrisung, P., & Prakitchaiwattana, C. (2024) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/ijfs.17171 · Cited by 2
(2021) · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research · doi:10.36632/mejar/2021.10.2.46 · Cited by 2
Probiotics in Poultry Nutrition as a Natural Alternative for Antibiotics
El-Hack, M. E. A., Alagawany, M. M., El-Shall, N. A., Shehata, A. M., Abdel-Moneim, A.-M. E., & Naiel, M. A. E. (2022) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815049015122010013 · Cited by 1
Awad, H., Omer, M., Omer, O. I. A., & Mohamed, I. O. M. (2026) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-026-02306-2 · Cited by 1
Potential pitfalls associated with testing of enzyme preparations in the Salmonella/microsome assay
Conti, L., & Crebelli, R. (2016) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.008 · Cited by 1
Effects of synbiotics on the gut microbiota, blood and rearing parameters of chickens
Śliżewska, K., Markowiak‐Kopeć, P., Żbikowski, A., et al. (2019) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1093/femsle/fnz116s · Cited by 1
Ronchetti, F., Springer, L., & Purnhagen, K. P. (2024) · SpringerBriefs in law · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49692-9_4 · Cited by 1
Antagonistic yeast: Eco-friendly tool for management plant diseases
Gogoi, A. R., Khiangte, L., Thapa, S., Baral, D., & Subba, A. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · doi:10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i7k.1632 · Cited by 2
Przeżywalność mikroorganizmów probiotycznych w modelu in vitro układu pokarmowego drobiu
Markowiak‐Kopeć, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2019) · Zywnosc-nauka Technologia Jakosc · doi:10.15193/zntj/2019/120/306
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2011) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2011.en-579
Self-citationEgy egészség – a 21. század problémája az antimikrobiális rezisztencia: Van kiút?
Kerek, Á., Nagy, Z., & Jerzsele, Á. (2023) · Scientia et Securitas · doi:10.1556/112.2022.00115
Safety aspects of natural starter used in sourdough products
Bleoancă, I., Grigore‐Gurgu, L., Păcularu‐Burada, B., & Bahrim, G. E. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18622-6.00002-5
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2025) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.en-9376
Self-citationGarin-Murguialday, N., Virto, R., Pagán, R., et al. (2026) · Methods and protocols in food science · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5064-6_6
Metadata
- Authors
- (EFSA), E. F. S. A.
- Corresponding author
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 226
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4238501663
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- food and feed additives, safety assessment, generic approach, microbiological safety, feed safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review