The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a generic approach to the safety assessment by EFSA of microorganisms used in food/feed and the production of food/feed additives: Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a generic approach to the safety assessment by EFSA of microorganisms used in fo
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the recent EFSA document, the requirements to be included in the ‘‘Qualified Presumption of Safety’’ (QPS) group include a lack of pathogenicity and the absence of acquired resistance genes [42].”
From Profiling the resistome and virulome of Bacillus strains used for probiotic-based sanitation: a multicenter WGS analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This may be the reason why yeasts sensu lato are generally regarded as safe and therefore applying yeasts in crops and on food products elicits less concern than applications of bacteria or filamentous fungi (European Food Safety Authority 2005).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as European Food Safety Authority 2005
Citations
Cites
European Commission 2003 On a generic approach to the safety assessment of microorganisms used in feed/food and feed/food production europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out178_en.pdf
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health
Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9091021 · Cited by 2,401
Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as “Probiotic” in Foods and Dietary Supplements
Binda, S., Hill, C., Johansen, E., Obis, D., Pot, B., Sanders, M. E., Tremblay, A., & Ouwehand, A. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01662 · Cited by 562
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2007) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.587 · Cited by 479
Self-citationBiocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications
Freimoser, F. M., Rueda-Mejia, M. P., Tilocca, B., & Migheli, Q. (2019) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-019-2728-4 · Cited by 462
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Ricci, A., Allende, A., Bolton, D., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Gironés, R., Herman, L., Koutsoumanis, K. P., Lindqvist, R., et al. (2017) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664 · Cited by 467
Metadata
- Authors
- (EFSA), E. F. S. A.
- Corresponding author
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 226
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4238501663
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- food and feed additives, safety assessment, generic approach, microbiological safety, feed safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
