Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐UK‐2008‐60) for placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide tolerant maize GA21 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Seeds
Open accessAbstract
) gene, conferring tolerance to glyphosate-based herbicides. Bioinformatic analyses and levels of the mEPSPS protein were considered sufficient. The comparative analysis of compositional, agronomic and phenotypic characteristics indicated that maize GA21 is not different from the conventional counterpart and its composition fell within the range observed among non-GM maize varieties, except for the presence of the mEPSPS protein in maize GA21. The safety assessment of maize GA21 identified no concerns regarding potential toxicity and allergenicity. A feeding study with broiler chickens confirmed that maize GA21 is as nutritious as its conventional counterpart. The EFSA GMO Panel considers that maize GA21 is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared to conventional maize, but that its cultivation management could result in environmental harm under certain conditions. The EFSA GMO Panel therefore recommends managing the use of glyphosate on maize GA21 within diversified cropping regimes that have similar or reduced environmental impacts compared with conventional maize cultivation. The EFSA GMO Panel recommends the deployment of case-specific monitoring to address (1) changes in botanical diversity within fields due to novel herbicide regimes, and (2) resistance evolution to glyphosate in weeds due to novel herbicide regimes. The EFSA GMO Panel agrees with the general surveillance plan of the applicant, but requests that its proposals to strengthen general surveillance are implemented. The EFSA GMO Panel concludes that the information available for maize GA21 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that maize GA21, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and commercial maize varieties with respect to potential adverse effects on human and animal health. If subjected to appropriate management measures, the cultivation management of maize GA21 is unlikely to raise safety concerns for the environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The European Food Safety Authority assessed the environmental impact of HT maize and soybean and concluded that their cultivation is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared to conventional maize or soybean in most conditions.
“The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the environmental impact of HT maize and soybean and concluded that their cultivation is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared to conventional maize or soybean in most conditions”
From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as EFSA, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 375 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- (GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O.
- Corresponding author
- EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2480-2480
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13093181
- OpenAlex
- W2963132508
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 375
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- transgenic maize, GA21, glyphosate tolerance, EPSPS, food and feed safety, allergenicity, broiler chickens, environmental risk, plant diversity, surveillance plan, cultivation management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review