Cited by 231Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control

Open access
Romeis, Jörg, Naranjo, Steven E., Meissle, Michael, Shelton, Anthony M.·2019·Biological Control

Abstract

• Insecticidal Bt crops were grown on more than 100 million hectares in 2017. • Risk assessment considers exposure and toxicity of natural enemies to Bt proteins. • Bt proteins appear not to harm natural enemies. • Reduced insecticide use in Bt crops can enhance the conservation of natural enemies. • Bt technology represents a powerful tool for IPM. Genetically engineered (GE) crops producing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (mainly Cry proteins) have become a major control tactic for a number of key lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, mainly in maize, cotton, and soybean. As with any management tactic, there is concern that using GE crops might cause adverse effects on valued non-target species, including arthropod predators and parasitoids that contribute to biological control. Such potential risks are addressed prior to the commercial release of any new GE plant. Over the past 20+ years, extensive experience and insight have been gained through laboratory and field-based studies of the non-target effects of crops producing Cry proteins. Overall, the vast majority of studies demonstrates that the insecticidal proteins deployed today cause no unintended adverse effects to natural enemies. Furthermore, when Bt crops replace synthetic chemical insecticides for target pest control, this creates an environment supportive of the conservation of natural enemies. As part of an overall integrated pest management (IPM) strategy, Bt crops can contribute to more effective biological control of both target and non-target pests. The growing use of insecticidal seed treatments in major field crops (Bt or not) may dampen the positive gains realized through reductions in foliar and soil insecticides. Nonetheless, Bt technology represents a powerful tool for IPM.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes 20+ years of evidence and concludes that Bt crops generally cause no unintended adverse effects on arthropod natural enemies and can support conservation biological control when they replace broad-spectrum insecticides. However, insecticidal seed treatments may dampen these benefits.

Key findings

  • Bt crops expressing Cry/Vip proteins were grown on 101 million hectares worldwide in 2017, with adoption above 80% in some regions; herbicide-tolerant GE crops were grown on 166.4 million hectares. Bt eggplant use in Bangladesh rose from 20 farmers in 2014 to over 27,000 in 2018.
  • Laboratory bitrophic studies covered 20 natural enemy species from 6 orders and 12 families; tritrophic studies with confirmed or expected exposure covered 6 hymenopteran parasitoids from 4 families, 32 predators from 12 families in 5 orders, and one entomopathogenic nematode. Meta-analysis found no negative effects of Bt plants/Cry proteins on natural enemies; parasitoid reproduction was higher on Bt-fed hosts, driven by a single study, and removing that study reduced the effect size to a non-significant 0.0633.
  • As of late 2008, over 63 field studies covering six classes, >21 orders, and >185 species concluded that nontarget effects of Bt crops are minimal or negligible, especially compared with insecticide use. A notable exception is specialist parasitoids in Bt maize, whose abundance may decline when their target hosts are effectively controlled.
  • In Arizona Bt cotton, the IPM strategy cumulatively saved growers over $500 million since 1996 ($274/ha/year) and prevented over 25 million pounds of active ingredient from being used; Bt cotton was described as a keystone technology enabling conservation biological control.

Methods

  • Narrative review with quantitative synthesis of laboratory bitrophic and tritrophic studies and field studies on Bt crops and natural enemies.
  • Meta-analysis of tritrophic studies used Hedge’s d, a random effects model, bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals, and MetaWin v2.1; only one independent metric per life-history trait was retained, and for multigeneration studies the final exposed generation was used.
  • Field evidence was summarized from prior meta-analyses and case studies in Bt cotton and Bt maize systems.

Limitations

  • Stated: agro-ecosystem complexity means indirect effects may only become visible once GE plants are grown in farmer fields; effects of herbicide-tolerant crop systems on arthropods and biological control are difficult to predict; insecticidal seed treatments may counteract gains from reduced foliar and soil insecticides; some claimed unexpected non-target effects were not verified and likely artifacts.
  • Stated/evident: Bt technology is largely limited to maize, cotton, and soybean and to relatively few countries in Europe and Africa, so conclusions depend on the available published studies.
  • Evident: this is a review with an embedded meta-analysis, not new empirical field or laboratory data; the parasitoid reproduction result was driven by a single study and became non-significant when that study was removed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001

Cites

321 of 321 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 176 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Eliminating this study reduced the effect size to a non-significant 0.0633.

    “Eliminating this study reduced the effect size to a non-significant 0.0633.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    This result was driven by a single study where parasitoids Cotesia plutellae were offered a choice between Bt resistant Plutella xylostella caterpillars on Bt compared with non-Bt oilseed rape in field simulators in the laboratory.

    “This result was driven by a single study where parasitoids (Cotesia plutellae; Hymenoptera: Braconidae) were offered a choice between Bt resistant Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) caterpillars on Bt compared with non-Bt oilseed rape in field simulators in the laboratory (Schuler et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schuler et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    The majority of bitrophic studies tested material from Bt-transgenic maize, followed by rice, potato, and cotton.

    “The majority of studies tested material from Bt-transgenic maize, followed by rice, potato, and cotton.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Meta-analysis results show that a variety of Bt plants and Cry proteins have no negative effects on a broad range of natural enemy species when non-target species were exposed in an ecologically realistic manner.

    “Results mirror those found in prior meta-analyses with fewer studies (Naranjo, 2009) in showing that a variety of Bt plants and Cry proteins have no negative effects on a broad range of natural enemy species when the non-target species were exposed in an ecologically realistic manner (Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naranjo, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    Through a literature review, 68 publications presenting results from tritrophic studies using Bt plant material as test substance were retrieved.

    “Through a literature review, we have retrived 68 publications presenting the results from such tritrophic studies using Bt plant material as the test substance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 54
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For parasitoids, studies tended to use Bt-resistant hosts more, but the results were the same regardless of the type of host.

    “For parasitoids, studies tended to use Bt-resistant hosts more, but again the results were the same regardless of the type of host.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For predators, the majority of studies used non-susceptible prey and the results were exactly the same whether using non-susceptible or Bt-resistant prey.

    “For predators, the majority of studies used non-susceptible prey and the results were exactly the same whether using non-susceptible or Bt-resistant prey (not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Effect sizes were generally larger for parasitoids, and analyses indicated that reproduction (number of progeny) was actually higher when their hosts had fed on Bt plants compared with non-Bt plants.

    “Effect sizes were generally larger for parasitoids and analyses indicated that reproduction (number of progeny) was actually higher when their hosts had fed on Bt plants compared with non-Bt plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The most commonly used test substance in bitrophic studies was pollen.

    “The most commonly used test substance was pollen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Overall, the Arizona cotton IPM strategy has cumulatively saved growers over $500 million since 1996 in yield protection and control costs ($274/ha/year), while preventing over 25 million pounds of active ingredient from being used in the environment.

    “Overall, the Arizona cotton IPM strategy has cumulatively saved growers over $500 million since 1996 in yield protection and control costs ($274/ha/year), while preventing over 25 million pounds of active ingredient from being used in the environment (Ellsworth et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellsworth et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Genetically engineered (GE) crops producing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), mainly Cry proteins, have become a major control tactic for key lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, mainly in maize, cotton, and soybean.

    “Genetically engineered (GE) crops producing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (mainly Cry proteins) have become a major control tactic for a number of key lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, mainly in maize, cotton, and soybean.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ISAAA, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bt crops can reduce target pest populations over broad scales, resulting in reduced damage on both GE and non-GE crops in the region.

    “There is evidence that Bt crops can reduce target pest populations over broad scales (Carrière et al., 2003;Dively et al., 2018;Hutchison et al., 2010;Wan et al., 2012;Wu et al., 2008;Zhang et al., 2018) resulting in reduced damage on both GE and non-GE crops in the region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carrière et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dively et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hutchison et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maize pollen is relatively heavy and deposited mainly within or close proximity to the maize field, limiting off-crop exposure, although certain wind conditions may lead to pollen drift over several kilometers.

    “Maize pollen is relatively heavy and deposited mainly within or in close proximity to the maize field, which limits exposure of arthropods offcrop, although certain wind conditions may lead to pollen drift over several kilometers (Sanvido et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanvido et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The European Food Safety Authority assessed the environmental impact of HT maize and soybean and concluded that their cultivation is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared to conventional maize or soybean in most conditions.

    “The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the environmental impact of HT maize and soybean and concluded that their cultivation is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared to conventional maize or soybean in most conditions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites EFSA, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites EFSA, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2017, GE varieties expressing one or several insecticidal genes from Bt were grown on a total of 101 million hectares worldwide, reaching adoption levels above 80% in some regions.

    “In 2017, GE varieties expressing one or several insecticidal genes from Bt were grown on a total of 101 million hectares worldwide, reaching adoption levels above 80% in some regions (ISAAA, 2017; Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ISAAA, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Because not all natural enemies potentially at risk can be tested, a representative subset of species (surrogates) is selected for assessment.

    “From a practical standpoint, because not all natural enemies potentially at risk can be tested, a representative subset of species (surrogates) is selected for assessment (Carstens et al., 2014;Romeis et al., 2013b;Wach et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carstens et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Romeis et al., 2013b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wach et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pyramid events, current Bt varieties expressing two or more insecticidal genes, are more effective in controlling target pests and help to slow down the evolution of resistance.

    “These so-called pyramid events are more effective in controlling the target pests and help to slow down the evolution of resistance (Gressel et al., 2017;Huang, 2015;Que et al., 2010;Zhao et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gressel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Huang, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Que et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    For insecticidal proteins in GE plants to directly affect a natural enemy, the organism has to ingest the toxin and be susceptible to it.

    “For insecticidal proteins in GE plants to directly affect a natural enemy, the organism has to ingest the toxin (exposure, see Section 4) and be susceptible to it (toxicity, see Section 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    GE insect-resistant crops have been grown on a large scale for more than 20 years, and there is considerable experience and knowledge on how they can affect natural enemies and how their risks can be assessed prior to commercialization.

    “GE insect resistant crops have been grown on a large scale for more than 20 years, and there is considerable experience and knowledge on how they can affect natural enemies and how their risks can be assessed prior to commercialization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Natural enemies can be exposed to plant-produced Bt proteins when feeding directly on plant tissue, or via prey or host species that have consumed Bt plant material.

    “Natural enemies can be exposed to plant produced-Bt proteins when feeding directly on plant tissue, or via prey or host species that have consumed Bt plant material (Fig. 2, routes 1 and 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Care was taken to preserve independence in observations from any one study and to use metrics that reflected the longest exposure to the Cry protein.

    “Care was taken to preserve independence in observations from any one study and to use metrics that reflected the longest exposure to the Cry protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Herbivores and other arthropods that have ingested Bt protein from Bt crop may leave the field and expose natural enemies off-crop, but this route is temporally very limited because of rapid excretion and digestion.

    “Finally, herbivores and other arthropods that have ingested Bt protein from the Bt crop may leave the field and expose natural enemies off-crop (Fig. 2, route 7).Because of the rapid excretion and digestion, however, this route of exposure is temporally very limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species not sensitive to individual toxins.

    “The available data indicate that these pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species that are not sensitive to the individual toxins (Graser et al., 2017;Guo et al., 2016;Haller et al. 2017;Kumar et al., 2014;Levine et al., 2016;Raybould et al., 2012;Shu et al., 2018;Su et al., 2015;Svobodová et al., 2017;Tian et al., 2014T”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Graser et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Guo et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Haller et al. 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Relevant data were extracted from identified studies for life history traits bearing on population dynamics and biological control function.

    “Relevant data were extracted from the identified studies (Tables S1 and S2) for various life history traits that have a bearing on population dynamics and biological control function (immature development, immature and adult survival, fecundity, parasitism and predation).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Only data from studies in which the plant was used as the source of the Cry protein were retained.

    “We further retained only data from studies in which the plant was used as the source of the Cry protein, although this plant material could have been incorporated into an artificial diet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pollen, plant debris, and exudates from living roots or decaying plant material might enter small streams close to agricultural fields, providing potential routes of exposure for aquatic organisms.

    “Pollen, plant debris, and also exudates from living roots or exudes from decaying plant material might enter small streams that often run close to agricultural fields (Rosi-Marshall et al., 2007;Tank et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rosi-Marshall et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tank et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The non-Bt plants used were generally isolines or near-isolines of the Bt plants (>90% of studies); remaining studies did not provide sufficient information.

    “The non-Bt plants used were generally isolines or near-isolines of the Bt plants (> 90% of studies); the remaining studies did not provide sufficient information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A random effects model was used for analyses, and bias-corrected, bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were used to determine if effect size differed from zero.

    “A random effects model was used for analyses to enable a broad inference of effects and bias-corrected, bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were used to determine if the effect size differed from zero.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    While tritrophic studies with aphids offer realistic trophic scenarios, they are not suitable for testing direct effects of Cry proteins on natural enemies.

    “While these studies offer realistic trophic scenarios, because aphids are common prey and hosts in crop fields, they are not suitable for testing the direct effects of Cry proteins on natural enemies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    With the introduction in 2006 of a selective insecticide for Lygus hesperus, the package was complete and overall insecticide use statewide for cotton was dramatically reduced.

    “With the introduction in 2006 of a selective insecticide for Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) the package was complete and overall insecticide use statewide for cotton was dramatically reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the USA, neonicotinoid seed-treatments for cotton are common in some production regions, where they can provide economic control of thrips during seedling establishment.

    “In the USA, neonicitinoid seed-treatments for cotton is common in some production regions (Allen et al., 2018;North et al., 2018;Toews et al., 2010), where it can provide economic control of thrips during the seedling establishment period (North et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Allen et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites North et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Toews et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatment usage on arthropod natural enemies are not well understood in cotton, but some data suggest minimal effects at recommended doses.

    “The impacts of such usage on arthropod natural enemies in not well understood in cotton, but some data suggest minimal effects at recommended doses (Saeed et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saeed et al. 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Extant data suggests that Bt crops do not alter the function of the natural enemy community and may provide for enhanced biological control services if they prevent or reduce the alternative use of broader-spectrum insecticides for control of the Bt targeted pest.

    “Nonetheless, extant data suggests that Bt crops do not alter the function of the natural enemy community and may provide for enhanced biological control services if they prevent or reduce the alternative use of broader-spectrum insecticides for control of the Bt targeted pest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Early tier laboratory studies can conservatively predict non-target effects expected in the field.

    “Further, it has been suggested that such early tier laboratory studies can conservatively predict non-target effects expected in the field (Duan et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Duan et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quickly increased adoption of Bt cotton led to broad, areawide control of the pest and opened the door for an opportunity to eradicate this invasive pest.

    “The quickly increased adoption of Bt cotton led to broad, areawide control of the pest (Carrière et al., 2003) and opened the door for an opportunity to eradicate this invasive pest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carrière et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In China, a large-scale study demonstrated that the decline in insecticide sprays in Bt cotton resulted in an increased abundance of important natural enemies and an associated decline in aphid populations.

    “In China, a large-scale study demonstrated that the decline in insecticide sprays in Bt cotton resulted in an increased abundance of important natural enemies and an associated decline in aphid populations (Lu et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lu et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Bt crops represent a highly selective control tactic that should conserve natural enemies and contribute to enhanced management of pests, especially if Bt crops replace the application of broad-spectrum insecticides for control of Bt targeted pests.

    “Thus, Bt crops represent a highly selective control tactic that should conserve natural enemies and contribute to enhanced management of pests, especially if Bt crops replace the application of broad-spectrum insecticides for control of Bt targeted pests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This provided clear evidence that commonly used insecticides harmed the internal parasitoid while Cry1C did not.

    “This provided clear evidence that the commonly used insecticides harmed the internal parasitoid while Cry1C did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brookes and Barfoot (2018) estimate massive reductions in foliar insecticide use in Bt cotton production globally, pointing strongly to the potential for conservation biological control to play an important and ever increasing role in IPM more broadly in this crop system.

    “Overall, Brookes and Barfoot (2018) estimate massive reductions in foliar insecticide use in Bt cotton production globally, pointing strongly to the potential for conservation biological control to play an important and ever increasing role in IPM more broadly in this crop system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brookes and Barfoot (2018)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bt cotton became a cornerstone element in the pink bollworm eradication program initiated in 2006 in Arizona, and insecticide use for this pest ceased entirely by 2008.

    “Bt cotton became a cornerstone element in the pink bollworm eradication program initiated in 2006 in Arizona, and insecticide use for this pest ceased entirely by 2008 (Naranjo and Ellsworth, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naranjo and Ellsworth, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This pattern was associated with a disproportionately larger reduction in broad-spectrum insecticides, resulting in most of the few insecticides now applied being those that more selectively target pests and conserve natural enemies.

    “This pattern was associated with a disproportionately larger reduction in broad-spectrum insecticides resulting in a situation where most of the few insecticides now applied are those that more selectively target the pests and conserve natural enemies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the second comparison study, adverse effects on natural enemies were observed in the pyrethroid treatment but not in the Bt broccoli treatment.

    “Again, adverse effects on the natural enemies were observed in the pyrethroid treatment but not in the case of Bt broccoli.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tian et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The use of seed treated with various neonicotinoids has become pervasive in several field crops in the USA and potentially negates to some degree the reduction in insecticides possible through the deployment of Bt crops.

    “The use of seed treated with various neonicitinoids has become pervasive in several field crops in the USA (Douglas and Tooker, 2015;Papiernik et al., 2018) and potentially negates to some degree the reduction in insecticides possible through the deployment of Bt crops.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Douglas and Tooker, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Papiernik et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When biological control was disrupted, it often led to an 'insecticide treadmill' for pests, which in turn led to their eventual resistance to insecticides.

    “They noted that when biological control was disrupted, it often led to an 'insecticide treadmill' for the pests which, in turn, led to their eventual resistance to the insecticides.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Smith and Hagen, 1959

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stern and van den Bosch, 1959

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stern et al., 1959

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Studies on widespread adoption of Bt maize in the Midwestern USA corn belt have demonstrated a dramatic decline in populations of O. nubilalis, and thus the need for insecticide treatments for this key lepidopteran pest.

    “Studies on the widespread adoption of Bt maize in the Midwestern USA corn belt have demonstrated a dramatic decline in populations of O. nubilalis, and thus the need for insecticide treatments for this key lepidopteran pest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a model of the Bt broccoli-P. xylostella-D. insulare system, parasitism by D. insulare provided the most reliable long-term control of P. xylostella and always delayed the evolution of resistance to Bt broccoli.

    “Simulations demonstrated that parasitism by D. insulare provided the most reliable long-term control of P. xylostella within this system and always delayed the evolution of resistance to Bt broccoli.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Onstad et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There has been a trend in the USA to add neonicotinoid seed treatments and to date virtually all maize seeds sold are treated.

    “However, as noted, there has been a trend in the USA to add neonicotinoid seed treatments and to date virtually all maize seeds sold are treated (Douglas and Tooker, 2015;Sappington et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Douglas and Tooker, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sappington et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This insurance approach is targeting a number of early-season pests that occur only sporadically but for some of which rescue treatments are not available.

    “This insurance approach is targeting a number of early-season pests that occur only sporadic but for some of which rescue treatments are not available (Gray, 2011;Sappington et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gray, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sappington et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cowpea is the most important grain legume in sub-Saharan Africa.

    “where cowpea is the most important grain legume (Murdock et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murdock et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Seed treatments in maize can negatively impact some natural enemy populations early season, even though there is recovery later on.

    “Recent work suggests that seed treatments in maize can negatively impact some natural enemy populations early season even though there is recovery later on (Disque et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Disque et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a greenhouse study over multiple generations, use of C. maculata and Bt broccoli provided excellent control of P. xylostella while delaying resistance in P. xylostella to Bt broccoli.

    “In a greenhouse study over multiple generations, use of C. maculata and Bt broccoli provided excellent control of P. xylostella while delaying resistance in P. xylostella to Bt broccoli (Liu et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bt sweet corn does not negatively affect predation rates of sentinel egg masses of the European corn borer, whereas lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb do.

    “Furthermore, this study demonstrated that Bt sweet corn provided better control of lepidopteran pests, and did not negatively affect the predation rates of sentinel egg masses of the European corn borer, as did lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Musser and Shelton, 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unlike most of the cotton production region in the US, the use of treated seed in Arizona is relatively rare (<13% of acreage), mainly because plants can quickly outgrow minor thrips damage and some species such as Frankliniella occidentalis are considered beneficial.

    “Unlike most of the cotton production region in the US, the use of treated seed in Arizona is relatively rare (< 13% of acreage, P. Ellsworth, personal communication), mainly because plants in this production environment can quickly outgrow any minor thrips damage and some species such as Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are actually considered beneficial (Gonzalez et al., 1982;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gonzalez et al., 1982

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trichilo and Leigh, 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While these studies document lower pest pressure because of widespread adoption of Bt maize and less need for insecticidal sprays, by implication they also suggest that widespread conservation of natural enemies may be occurring.

    “While these studies document lower pest pressure because of wide spread adoption of Bt maize and less need for insecticidal sprays, by implication they also suggest that widespread conservation of natural enemies may be occurring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This decline occurred not only for those who adopted Bt maize, but also for surrounding maize farmers that did not.

    “Furthermore, this decline occurred not only for those who adopted Bt maize, but also for surrounding maize farmers that did not (Hutchinson et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hutchinson et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A similar 'halo' effect of lepidopteran suppression by widespread adoption of Bt maize in the eastern USA has been documented, as well as benefits of pest declines in surrounding vegetable fields.

    “A similar 'halo' effect of lepidopteran suppression by the widespread adoption of Bt maize in the eastern USA has also been documented, as well as the benefits of pest declines in surrounding vegetable fields (Dively et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dively et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cry1 proteins expressed in plants control targeted Lepidoptera but do not harm important natural enemies, thus conserving them to function as biological control agents.

    “As described previously, multiple studies have shown that Cry1 proteins expressed in plants control targeted Lepidoptera but do not harm important natural enemies, thus conserving them to function as biological control agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two rice lines expressing a cry1Ab/Ac fusion gene received biosafety certificates by the Ministry of Agriculture in 2009, but no Bt rice is commercialized yet.

    “While two lines expressing a cry1Ab/Ac fusion gene have received biosafety certificates by the Ministry of Agriculture already in 2009, no Bt rice is commercialized yet (Li et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CRISPR-Cas9 has been successfully applied to crop plants to alter agriculturally important traits such as disease resistance and drought tolerance.

    “The technique has already been successfully applied to crop plants to alter agriculturally important traits such as disease resistance (Wang et al., 2014) and drought tolerance (Shi et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shi et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The insecticidal proteins deployed today have a narrow spectrum of activity and cause no detrimental unintended effects to natural enemies.

    “As expected and intended, the insecticidal proteins deployed today have a narrow spectrum of activity and cause no detrimental unintended effects to natural enemies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Overall, the change in insecticide use has benefitted non-target species in general and biological control in particular.

    “Overall, the change in insecticide use has benefitted non-target species in general and biological control in particular.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Genome editing techniques allow the knock-out of a specific gene.

    “These techniques allow the knock-out of a specific gene.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The alpha-amylase inhibitor αAI-1 from green bean has been introduced into various other legumes and provides very high levels of protection from certain susceptible bruchid species.

    “A compound that is of particular interest is the alpha-amylase inhibitor αAI-1 from the green bean that has been introduced into various other legumes and shown to provide very high levels of protection from certain (susceptible) bruchid (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) species (Lüthi et al., 2013a;Morton et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lüthi et al., 2013a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morton et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Suppression of Snf7 causes increased D. v. virgifera larval mortality leading to reduced root damage.

    “Suppression of Snf7 has been reported to cause increased D. v. virgifera larval mortality leading to reduced root damage (Bolognesi et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bolognesi et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The potential of RNAi for pest control was first demonstrated in 2007 for H. armigera and Diabrotica virgifera virgifera.

    “The potential of RNAi for pest control has first been demonstrated in 2007 for H. armigera and Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Baum et al., 2007;Mao et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baum et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mao et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Effective toxins have been isolated from other bacteria including species of Pseudomonas and Chromobacter that might be expressed in future insect-resistant GE plants.

    “In addition to Bt, effective toxins have also been isolated from other bacteria including species of Pseudomonas (Anderson et al., 2018) and Chromobacter (Sampson et al. 2017) that might be expressed in future insect-resistant GE plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Anderson et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sampson et al. 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tissue-specific and inducible promoters may help limit exposure to natural enemies and can be used for resistance management.

    “Other examples of nonconstitutive promoters include tissue-specific and inducible promoters that may help not only limit exposure to natural enemies but can be used for resistance management (Bates et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bates et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: In today's Bt-transgenic plants, expression of insecticidal genes is driven by constitutive promotors (e.g., CaMV 35s) and the proteins are constantly produced in most plant tissues.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance to dsRNA was not sequence-specific but caused by impaired luminal uptake, indicated by cross resistance to other dsRNAs tested.

    “Interestingly, resistance was not sequence-specific but caused by an impaired luminal uptake, indicated by cross resistance to other dsRNAs tested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khajuria et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The first insect-resistant dsRNA-expressing GE crop was registered by the US EPA in June 2017.

    “The first insect-resistant dsRNA-expressing GE crop was registered by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in June 2017 (https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-registers- innovative-tool-control-corn-rootworm).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-registers- innovative-tool-control-corn-rootworm

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dietary RNAi works very well in Coleoptera but less so in Lepidoptera.

    “In general, dietary RNAi works very well in Coleoptera but less so in Lepidoptera (Baum and Roberts, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baum and Roberts, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The efficacy of Bt-transgenic crops in controlling important target pests has been very high.

    “The efficacy of Bt-transgenic crops in controlling important target pests has been very high.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Insect-resistant GE varieties can help to increase yields and provide economic benefits to farmers and also improve environmental and human health.

    “Consequently, such insect-resistant GE varieties can not only help to increase yields and provide economic benefits to farmers but also improve environmental and human health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New plant breeding techniques, such as genome editing that are protein-mediated or based on sequence-specific nucleases, are continuously being developed.

    “New plant breeding techniques, such as genome editing that are protein-mediated or based on sequence-specific nucleases are continuously been developed (Baltes and Voytas, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baltes and Voytas, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GM crops can contribute to sustainable development goals with benefits to farmers, consumers, the environment and the economy.

    “There is compelling evidence that GM crops can contribute to sustainable development goals with benefits to farmers, consumers, the environment and the economy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EASAC, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

69 of 69
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The published laboratory and field studies reviewed are representative and unbiased with respect to the non-target effects of Bt crops.

    “Over the past 20+ years, extensive experience and insight have been gained through laboratory and field-based studies of the non-target effects of crops producing Cry proteins.”
    “Overall, the vast majority of studies demonstrates that the insecticidal proteins deployed today cause no unintended adverse effects to natural enemies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In today's Bt-transgenic plants, expression of insecticidal genes is driven by constitutive promotors (e.g., CaMV 35s) and the proteins are constantly produced in most plant tissues.

    “In today's Bt-transgenic plants, the expression of the insecticidal genes is driven by constitutive promotors (i.e., CaMV 35s) and the proteins are constantly produced in most plant tissues.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CYP71A1 gene encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of tryptamine to serotonin.

    “The gene encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of tryptamine to serotonin.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

31 of the 352 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. CERA, 2012. A Review of the Environmental Safety of Vip3Aa. Center for Environmental Risk Assessment, ILSI Research Foundation, Washington DC, USA. Available online: <http://ilsi.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/06/vip3Aa_EN.pdf>.
  2. CERA, 2013b. A Review of the Environmental Safety of the Cry1F Protein. Center for Environmental Risk Assessment, ILSI Research Foundation, Washington DC, USA. Available online: <http://ilsi.org/researchfoundation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/05/Cry1f-monograph.pdf>.
  3. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), 2009, EFSA J., 1149, 1
  4. Liu, 2014, Natural enemies delay insect resistance to Bt plants, PLoS One, 9
  5. Meissle, 2004, Implications for the parasitoid Campoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) when developing in Bt maize-fed Spodoptera littoralis larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), IOBC/WPRS Bull., 27, 117
  6. Pertry, I., Sanou, E.I.R., Speelman, S., Ingelbrecht, I., 2016. The success story of Bt cotton in Burkina Faso: a role model for sustainable cotton production in other cotton growing countries? In: De Buck, S., Ingelbrecht, I., Heijde, M., Van Montagu, M. (Eds.), Innovative Farming and Forestry Across the Emerging World: The Role of Genetically Modified Crops and Trees. International Industrial Biotechnology Network (IIBN), e-book, pp. 81–93. Available online: <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8500337/file/8501700>.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Agroscope (CH)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Romeis, Jörg
Venue
Biological Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
130
Pages
136-154
ISSN
1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894891153
Cited by
231
References
352
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Biological Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agroscope
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bt crops, Bacillus thuringiensis, Cry proteins, conservation biological control, natural enemies, non-target effects, insecticidal seed treatment, integrated pest management, insecticide reduction, genetically modified crops

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review