The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations
Open accessAbstract
This guidance document refers to the applications for authorisation of a new food additive or to a modification of an already authorised food additive, combining in a single document the description of the data requirements and their context, and also a description of the risk assessment paradigm applied. The document is arranged in four main sections: chemistry and specifications, existing authorisations and evaluations, proposed uses and exposure assessment, and toxicological studies. Assessment of the exposure to food additives is based on information on known or anticipated human exposure to the proposed additive or toxicologically relevant components of the additive from food, and any other potential dietary sources. For the toxicological studies, this guidance describes a tiered approach which balances data requirements against the risk, taking into consideration animal welfare by adopting animal testing strategies in line with the 3-Rs (replacement, refinement, reduction). This tiered approach for toxicological studies consists of 3 tiers, for which the testing requirements, key issues and triggers are described. According to this tiered approach, a minimal dataset applicable to all compounds has been developed under Tier 1, while Tier 2 testing, generating more extensive data, will be required for compounds which are absorbed and/or demonstrate (geno)toxicity in Tier 1 tests. Tier 3 should be performed on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all the available data, to elucidate specific endpoints needing further investigation of findings in Tier 2 tests. This guidance document replaces the previous guidance document by the Scientific Committee for Food published in 2001.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0804615 · Cited by 2,239
Cited by
High-value products from microalgae—their development and commercialisation
Borowitzka, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-013-9983-9 · Cited by 1,585
Natural Bioactive Compounds from Food Waste: Toxicity and Safety Concerns
Vilas-Boas, A. A., Pintado, M., & Oliveira, A. L. S. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10071564 · Cited by 217
Magnuson, B., Munro, I., Abbot, P., Baldwin, N., Lopez-Garcia, R., Ly, K., McGirr, L., Roberts, A., & Socolovsky, S. (2013) · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · doi:10.1080/19440049.2013.795293 · Cited by 200
Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
(ANS), E. P. O. F. A. A. N. S. A. T. F., Mortensen, A., Aguilar, F., Crebelli, R., Di Domenico, A., Dusemund, B., Frutos, M. J., Galtier, P., Gott, D., Gundert‐Remy, U., et al. (2017) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787 · Cited by 143
Self-citationPrecup, G., Marini, E., Zakidou, P., Beneventi, E., Consuelo, C., Fernández-Fraguas, C., Garcia Ruiz, E., Laganaro, M., Magani, M., Mech, A., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1390734 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- (ANS), E. P. O. F. A. A. N. S. A. T. F.
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2760-2760
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2915518036
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.