Cited by 200Agricultural safety and regulationsFood Safety and HygieneDye analysis and toxicity

Review of the regulation and safety assessment of food substances in various countries and jurisdictions

Open access
Magnuson, Bernadene, Munro, Ian, Abbot, Peter, Baldwin, Nigel, Lopez-Garcia, Rebeca, Ly, Karen, McGirr, Larry, Roberts, Ashley +1 more·2013·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Abstract

This review compares the regulations, definitions and approval processes for substances intentionally added to or unintentionally present in human food in the following specific countries/jurisdictions: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and the United States. This includes direct food additives, food ingredients, flavouring agents, food enzymes and/or processing aids, food contact materials, novel foods, and nanoscale materials for food applications. The regulatory authority of each target jurisdiction/country uses its own regulatory framework and although the definitions, regulations and approval processes may vary among all target countries, in general there are many similarities. In all cases, the main purpose of each authority is to establish a regulatory framework and maintain/enforce regulations to ensure that food consumed and sold within its respective countries is safe. There is a move towards harmonisation of food regulations, as illustrated by Australia and New Zealand and by Mercosur. The European Union has also established regulations, which are applicable for all member states, to establish a common authorisation procedure for direct food additives, flavourings and enzymes. Although the path for approval of different categories of food additives varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, there are many commonalities in terms of the data requirements and considerations for assessment of the safety of use of food additives, including the use of positive lists of approved substances, pre-market approval, and a separation between science and policy decisions. The principles applied are largely reflective of the early work by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) committees and JECFA assessments of the safety of food additives for human and animal foods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19440049.2013.795293

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of universal guidelines specifically developed for the safety and environmental assessment of nanotechnology food applications.

    “there is a lack of universal guidelines specifically developed for the safety and environmental assessment of nanotechnology food applications”

    From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Magnuson et al., 2013

  • Recent evidence does not allow building a sound science-based regulatory framework.

    “Recent evidence do not allow to build a sounds science-based regulatory framework”

    From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Magnuson et al., 2013

  • There are currently no specific regulations on nanotechnology food applications in the EU, USA, or elsewhere.

    “there are currently no specific regulations on nanotechnology food applications either in EU, USA or elsewhere”

    From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Magnuson et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [OAG] Office of the Auditor General of Canada Chapter 12—Creation of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency: main points 1998 In: 1998 September Report of the Auditor General of Canada [Internet]; [cited 1988 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_199809_12_e_9318.html#mp

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magnuson, B., Munro, I., Abbot, P., Baldwin, N., Lopez-Garcia, R., Ly, K., McGirr, L., Roberts, A., & Socolovsky, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Intertek (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Magnuson, Bernadene
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Published
2013-07
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1147-1220
ISSN
  • 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0057
OpenAlex
W2113403465
Cited by
200
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • European Food Safety Authority
  • European Commission
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Dye analysis and toxicity
Keywords
food additive regulation, food safety assessment, food additives, food ingredients, flavouring agents, food enzymes, processing aids, food contact materials, novel foods, regulatory harmonisation, premarket approval, JECFA, international regulatory comparison
MeSH terms
Legislation, Food, Safety, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review