Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin C
Open accessAbstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) derived Dietary Reference Values (DRVs) for vitamin C. The Panel concludes that an Average Requirement (AR) can be derived from indicators of vitamin C status, as well as a Population Reference Intake (PRI) assuming a coefficient of variation (CV) of 10 %. Several health outcomes possibly associated with vitamin C intake were also considered but data were found to be insufficient to establish DRVs. For healthy adults, the AR is determined from the quantity of vitamin C that balances metabolic vitamin C losses and allows the maintenance of an adequate body pool characterised by fasting plasma ascorbate concentrations at around 50 µmol/L. In men, an AR of 90 mg/day of vitamin C and a PRI of 110 mg/day are proposed. As no value for metabolic losses is available in women, the AR for women is extrapolated from the AR for men on the basis of differences in reference body weight, and an AR of 80 mg/day and a PRI of 95 mg/day are proposed. For infants aged 7–11 months, the Panel has decided to retain the PRI of 20 mg/day set by the SCF (1993), as no suitable evidence has emerged since the previous assessment. For children and adolescents, the ARs for vitamin C are extrapolated from the ARs for adults taking into account differences in reference body weight, and PRIs are derived, ranging from 20 mg/day for 1 to 3 year-old children, to 100 and 90 mg/day for boys and girls aged 15–17 years, respectively. For pregnant and lactating women, vitamin C intakes of 10 mg/day and of 60 mg/day in addition to the PRI of non-pregnant non-lactating women are proposed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animal sources do not contribute much to vitamin C intake because their content is generally low, except livestock livers and some fish eggs, but they are important to nations living in subarctic areas.
“Although most vertebrates are able to synthesize vitamin C, animal sources do not contribute much to the intake because the content of vitamin C in them is generally low, except for livestock livers, which are consumed minimally, and some fish eggs. However, they are of the utmost importance to nations living in subarctic areas [12,13].”
From Vitamin C-Sources, Physiological Role, Kinetics, Deficiency, Use, Toxicity, and Determination (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Section 3.1 (p. 19) says animal tissues generally contain less vitamin C than the listed plant foods, identifies liver and kidney as higher-content animal foods, and names plant foods as the main contributors to adults’ intake. It does not address fish eggs, minimal consumption of livestock liver, or the importance of animal foods to people living in subarctic areas. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPotatoes accounted for an average of 8% of total daily vitamin C intake in European countries in recent years.
“In recent years, they have accounted for an average of 8% of the total daily intake of vitamin C in European countries [3,12].”
From Vitamin C-Sources, Physiological Role, Kinetics, Deficiency, Use, Toxicity, and Determination (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Section 3.1 (p. 19) identifies potatoes as a main contributor to adults’ vitamin C intake, and Section 3.2 (pp. 19–20) discusses vitamin C intake surveys in European countries. The passages do not give an average potato contribution of 8% of total daily intake, so the numerical claim is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 199 · Cited by 173
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Amcoff E, Edberg A, Enghardt Barbieri H, Lindroos AK, Nälsén C, Pearson M and Warensjö Lemming E, 2012. Riksmaten - vuxna 2010-11. Livsmedels- och näringsintag bland vuxna i Sverige. Livsmedelsverket, 180 pp.
- ECOHOST/WHO (European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition/World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe), 1999. Nutrition and lifestyle in the Baltic Republics. pp. 59.
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies on a request from the Commission related to the Tolerable Upper Intake Level of vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid, its calcium, potassium and sodium salts and L-ascorbyl-6palmitate). The EFSA Journal 2004, 59, 1-21. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2004.59 · DOI
- Eichholzer M, Stahelin HB, Gey KF, Ludin E and Bernasconi F, 1996. Prediction of male cancer mortality by plasma levels of interacting vitamins: 17-year follow-up of the prospective Basel study. International Journal of Cancer, 66, 145-150.
- Enghardt-Barbieri H, Pearson M and Becker W, 2006. Riksmaten - Barn 2003. Livsmedels - och näringsintag bland barn i Sverige. Livsmedelsverket, 216 pp.
- Read RSD, 1987. Vitamin C. Journal of Food and Nutrition, 44, 9-35.
- Authors
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (.
- Corresponding author
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889222030
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 199
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Keywords
- vitamin C, dietary reference values, plasma ascorbate, sex differences, pregnant women, lactating women, infants, children and adolescents, health outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review