The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for zinc
Open accessAbstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) derived Dietary Reference Values for zinc, using a two-stage factorial approach and reference values for body weight. The first stage of estimating physiological requirements used studies that had physiologically plausible data, specifically related to faecal excretion of endogenous zinc. Adult physiological requirements were closely related to body size, and sex differences were not detectable after adjustment for body weight. Average Requirements (ARs) for dietary zinc necessary to meet physiological requirements were estimated using saturation response modelling, taking into account the inhibitory effect of dietary phytate on zinc absorption. Estimated ARs and Population Reference Intakes (PRIs) are provided for phytate intake levels of 300, 600, 900 and 1 200 mg/day, which cover the range of mean/median intakes observed in European populations. ARs range from 6.2 to 10.2 mg/day for women with a reference weight of 58.5 kg and from 7.5 to 12.7 mg/day for men with a reference weight of 68.1 kg. PRIs were derived from the zinc requirement of individuals with a body weight at the 97.5th percentile for reference weights for men and women and range from 7.5 to 12.7 mg/day for women and from 9.4 to 16.3 mg/day for men. ARs for infants from seven months of age and for children were estimated factorially, based on extrapolation from estimates of adult losses plus zinc needs for growth, and range from 2.4 to 11.8 mg/day. PRIs for infants and children were derived by assuming a coefficient of variation of 10 %, and range from 2.9 to 14.2 mg/day. For pregnancy and lactation, additional zinc requirements related to fetal and maternal tissues and transfer of zinc into breast milk, respectively, were considered and additional PRIs of 1.6 and 2.9 mg/day, respectively, were estimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These concentrations do not pose a health risk, as the tolerable upper intake level for Cr(III) in adults is 1 mg/day [64].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci influencing human serum metabolite levels
Kettunen, J., Tukiainen, T., Sarin, A.-P., Ortega-Alonso, A., Tikkanen, E., Lyytikäinen, L.-P., Kangas, A. J., Soininen, P., Würtz, P., Silander, K., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1073 · Cited by 553
Beck, F. W., Prasad, A. S., Kaplan, J., Fitzgerald, J. T., & Brewer, G. J. (1997) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1997.272.6.e1002 · Cited by 345
Beck, F. W. J., Kaplan, J., Fine, N., Handschu, W., & Prasad, A. S. (1997) · Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0022-2143(97)90091-3 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Zinc in Infection and Inflammation
Gammoh, N., & Rink, L. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9060624 · Cited by 818
Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023
Blomhoff, R., Andersen, R., Arnesen, E. K., Christensen, J. J., Eneroth, H., Erkkola, M., Gudanaviciene, I., Halldórsson, Þ. I., Høyer-Lund, A., Lemming, E. W., et al. (2023) · Nordic Council of Ministers eBooks · doi:10.6027/nord2023-003 · Cited by 441
Adjunctive Nutraceuticals for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
Sarris, J., Murphy, J., Mischoulon, D., Papakostas, G. I., Fava, M., Berk, M., & Ng, C. H. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15091228 · Cited by 436
Dietary species richness as a measure of food biodiversity and nutritional quality of diets
Lachat, C., Raneri, J. E., Smith, K. W., Kolsteren, P., Van Damme, P., Verzelen, K., Penafiel, D., Vanhove, W., Kennedy, G., Hunter, D., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1709194115 · Cited by 248
Gene losses in the common vampire bat illuminate molecular adaptations to blood feeding
Blumer, M., Brown, T., Freitas, M. B., Destro, A. L., Oliveira, J. A., Morales, A. E., Schell, T., Greve, C., Pippel, M., Jebb, D., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm6494 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (.
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3844
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2556204867
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for zinc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3844
- The paper
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (. (2014). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for zinc. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.