Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet; none of the 62 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Uptake and Translocation of Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Zinc by Tomato Plants Grown in Nutrient and Contaminated Nutrient Solutions: Implications for Food Safety

Open access
Milačič Ščančar, Radmila, Kozlica, Katarina, Marković, Stefan, Leban, Pia, Vidmar, Janja, Heath, Ester, Kacjan Maršić, Nina, Železnikar, Špela, Ščančar, Janez·2025·Toxics

Abstract

The uptake and translocation of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L. Rally) were investigated. Tomato seedlings were grown for five weeks in pots containing 40 L of Hoagland nutrient solution (pH 7) or contaminated nutrient solutions at two concentration levels for each element: Cr (100 and 1000 ng/mL), Zn (100 and 1000 ng/mL), Pb (100 and 500 ng/mL), and Cd (50 and 500 ng/mL). The solutions were replenished weekly to maintain a volume of 40 L (pH 7), and 10 mL samples were collected for elemental analysis. After five weeks, the plants were harvested and separated into roots, stems, leaves, and fruits. These samples underwent microwave-assisted digestion, and the element concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The results revealed that the elements were mainly accumulated in the roots, with much lower concentrations determined in the fruits. Pb and Cr accumulated only minimally in fruits, with Pb levels of 0.0009 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 0.003 mg/kg wet weight at LII, and Cr levels of 0.028 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 0.031 mg/kg wet weight at LII. The Pb levels did not exceed the permissible limits set by EC regulations (0.05 mg/kg wet weight). Zn exhibited the highest accumulation in fruits, with 2.17 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 4.8 mg/kg wet weight at LII. By contrast, the Cd concentrations in fruits (0.25 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 1.1 mg/kg wet weight at LII) exceeded the EC regulatory limit of 0.02 mg/kg wet weight. The uptake of other essential elements into the tomato plant remained largely unaffected by the presence of contaminants. These results provide valuable insights into food safety. Laser ablation (LA)-ICP-MS imaging revealed an even distribution of Cd and Zn in the leaves of plants grown in contaminated nutrient solutions. By contrast, Cr and Pb were predominantly localized in the leaf veins and at the leaf apex, suggesting different transport mechanisms for these elements from the roots to the aerial parts of the plant.

Checked 2026-11-15 · 2 references not checked yet

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

Tomato plants exposed to Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in Hoagland solution accumulated these elements mainly in roots; Cd and Zn translocated to fruits more than Pb and Cr. Cd in fruits exceeded EU limits and produced hazard quotients above 1 for toddlers and adults under high or Level II exposure, while Pb remained below regulatory limits.

Key findings

  • Roots were the main sink: at Level II, roots contained 107 mg/kg Pb, 332 mg/kg Cr, 384 mg/kg Cd, and 551 mg/kg Zn, versus control roots at 0.454, 0.508, 0.150, and 11.3 mg/kg, respectively.
  • Fruit Pb and Cr were low: Pb was 0.0009 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 0.003 mg/kg wet weight at LII, below the EC limit of 0.05 mg/kg wet weight; Cr was reported as 0.028 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 0.031 mg/kg wet weight at LII in the abstract.
  • Fruit Cd exceeded the EC limit of 0.02 mg/kg wet weight: 0.25 mg/kg wet weight at LI and 1.1 mg/kg wet weight at LII, i.e. 12 and 50 times over the limit; Zn was the highest fruit accumulator at 2.17 and 4.8 mg/kg wet weight at LI and LII. Uptake of other essential elements was largely unaffected by contaminant exposure.
  • Pb hazard quotients remained below 1, but Cd hazard quotients at LII averaged 3.22 for toddlers and 1.32 for adults; at high consumption they exceeded 1 at both LI and LII (toddlers 2.30 and 14.0; adults 1.17 and 5.76). LA-ICP-MS showed Cd and Zn evenly distributed in leaves, while Cr and Pb were mainly in leaf veins and at the leaf apex.

Methods

  • Five-week greenhouse hydroponic experiment with Solanum lycopersicum L. Rally seedlings in 40 L Hoagland solution at pH 7, either control or spiked at two levels: Cr 100/1000 ng/mL, Zn 100/1000 ng/mL, Pb 100/500 ng/mL, Cd 50/500 ng/mL; solutions were replenished weekly and pH adjusted to 7.
  • Plants were harvested into roots, stems, leaves, and fruits; samples were microwave-digested and analyzed by ICP-MS for Pb, Cr, Cd, Zn, and essential elements; leaf element localization used LA-ICP-MS; translocation factors and hazard quotients were calculated, with dietary exposure assessed for toddlers and adults using EFSA consumption data.
  • Accuracy was checked with SPS-SW1, NIST SRM 1573a Tomato Leaves, and a Pb spike recovery test (99%); all analyses were performed in duplicate.

Limitations

  • The paper states that direct comparison with literature is difficult because of differing experimental conditions; no intermediate destructive sampling was performed; the experiment ended at the first mature fruit stage (BBCH 809) due to disease onset; plastic adsorption and Pb/Cr hydroxide precipitation reduced contaminant concentrations; future isotope-enriched work is needed to distinguish natural from added element uptake.
  • Evident from the text: the findings come from one hydroponic greenhouse trial with a single tomato cultivar over five weeks, so field/soil and longer-term irrigation conditions are not represented.
  • Evident from the text: the abstract and results text disagree on the Cr fruit concentration at LII (0.031 vs 0.31 mg/kg wet weight), which affects certainty in that endpoint.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/toxics13090738

Cites

53 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Flow chart showing the experimental design.
Figure 1 Flow chart showing the experimental design.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The uptake of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in the tomato plant from the nutrient solution (C) and nutrient solution contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The height of the bars represents elemental concentrations expressed on a wet weight basis as an average of three plants, with the error bars indicating the relative standard deviation (%).
Figure 2 The uptake of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in the tomato plant from the nutrient solution (C) and nutrient solution contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The height of the bars represents elemental concentrations expressed on a wet weight basis as an average of three plants, with the error bars indicating the relative standard deviation (%).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The uptake of essential elements in the tomato plant from nutrient solutions (C) and nutrient solutions contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The height of the bars represents element concentrations expressed on a wet weight basis as an average of three plants, with the error bars indicating the relative standard deviation (%).
Figure 3 The uptake of essential elements in the tomato plant from nutrient solutions (C) and nutrient solutions contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The height of the bars represents element concentrations expressed on a wet weight basis as an average of three plants, with the error bars indicating the relative standard deviation (%).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 LA-ICP-MS images of tomato leaves showing the relative distribution of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in the control sample (C) and samples grown in nutrient solutions contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The color scale (red to blue; highest to lowest) denotes the elemental concentrations.
Figure 4 LA-ICP-MS images of tomato leaves showing the relative distribution of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn in the control sample (C) and samples grown in nutrient solutions contaminated with Pb, Cr, Cd, and Zn at concentration levels LI and LII. The color scale (red to blue; highest to lowest) denotes the elemental concentrations.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 28 Not checked · 61 Own results and interpretations

47 more claims

Create a free account to see all 89 claims and to verify the 62 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2018, Evaluation of concentrations of heavy metals in water used in agricultural irrigation, Open Access Libr., 5, e4959
  2. Prakash, 2021, Arsenic: Its toxicity and impact on human health, Int. J. Biol., 3, 38
  3. Salem, 2016, Toxic heavy metals accumulation in tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum), J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 11, 399
  4. Sulaiman, 2019, Health risk assessment of heavy metals accumulation in tomatoes irrigation farms at Kwadon, Gombe, Nigeria, ATBU J. Sci., 7, 271
  5. 1860, Uber die Ableitung mittlerer Resultate aus meteorologischen Beobachtungen, Repert. Für Meteorol., 1, 107
  6. Dorais, M. (2003, January 9). The use of supplemental lighting for vegetable crop production: Light intensity, crop response, nutrition, crop management, cultural practices. Proceedings of the Canadian Greenhouse Conference, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada.

Cited by

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Milačič Ščančar, R., Kozlica, K., Marković, S., Leban, P., Vidmar, J., Heath, E., Kacjan Maršić, N., Železnikar, Š., & Ščančar, J.
Affiliations
  • Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Jožef Stefan Institute (SI)
  • Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Agronomy, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Ščančar, Janez
Venue
Toxics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-08-31
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
738
ISSN
2305-6304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413928644
Cited by
8
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
lead uptake, chromium uptake, cadmium uptake, zinc uptake, tomato, food safety, root-to-shoot translocation, Hoagland solution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Uptake and Translocation of Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Zinc by Tomato Plants Grown in Nutrient and Contaminated Nutrient Solutions: Implications for Food Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/toxics13090738
The paper
Milačič Ščančar, R., Kozlica, K., Marković, S., Leban, P., Vidmar, J., Heath, E., Kacjan Maršić, N., Železnikar, Š., & Ščančar, J. (2025). The Uptake and Translocation of Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Zinc by Tomato Plants Grown in Nutrient and Contaminated Nutrient Solutions: Implications for Food Safety. Toxics. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.