The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed: Risk profile of insects as food and feed
Open accessAbstract
The present opinion has the format of a risk profile and presents potential biological and chemical hazards as well as allergenicity and environmental hazards associated with farmed insects used as food and feed taking into account of the entire chain, from farming to the final product. The opinion also addresses the occurrence of these hazards in non-processed insects, grown on different substrate categories, in comparison to the occurrence of these hazards in other non-processed sources of protein of animal origin. When currently allowed feed materials are used as substrate to feed insects, the possible occurrence of microbiological hazards is expected to be comparable to their occurrence in other non-processed sources of protein of animal origin. The possible occurrence of prions in non-processed insects will depend on whether the substrate includes protein of human or ruminant origin. Data on transfer of chemical contaminants from different substrates to the insects are very limited. Substrates like kitchen waste, human and animal manure are also considered and hazards from insects fed on these substrates need to be specifically assessed. It is concluded that for both biological and chemical hazards, the specific production methods, the substrate used, the stage of harvest, the insect species and developmental stage, as well as the methods for further processing will all have an impact on the occurrence and levels of biological and chemical contaminants in food and feed products derived from insects. Hazards related to the environment are expected to be comparable to other animal production systems. The opinion also identifies the uncertainties (lack of knowledge) related to possible hazards when insects are used as food and feed and notes that there are no systematically collected data on animal and human consumption of insects. Studies on the occurrence of microbial pathogens of vertebrates as well as published data on hazardous chemicals in reared insects are scarce. Further data generation on these issues are highly recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security
van Huis, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 · Cited by 1,947
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201200735 · Cited by 1,796
Oonincx, D. G. A. B., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051145 · Cited by 925
Oonincx, D. G. A. B., van Itterbeeck, J., Heetkamp, M. J. W., van den Brand, H., van Loon, J. J. A., & van Huis, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014445 · Cited by 853
Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores
Finke, M. D. (2002) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.10031 · Cited by 781
Water Resources: Agricultural and Environmental Issues
PIMENTEL, D., BERGER, B., FILIBERTO, D., NEWTON, M., WOLFE, B., KARABINAKIS, E., CLARK, S., POON, E., ABBETT, E., & NANDAGOPAL, S. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0909:wraaei]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 755
Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii
Zimmermann, G. (2007) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583150701309006 · Cited by 726
Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review
Belluco, S., Losasso, C., Maggioletti, M., Alonzi, C. C., Paoletti, M. G., & Ricci, A. (2013) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12014 · Cited by 708
Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review
Sánchez-Muros, M.-J., Barroso, F. G., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.068 · Cited by 663
Cited by
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
Gold, M., Tomberlin, J. K., Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.022 · Cited by 528
Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges
Lange, K. W., & Nakamura, Y. (2021) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001 · Cited by 344
Poma, G., Cuykx, M., Amato, E., Calaprice, C., Focant, J. F., & Covaci, A. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.006 · Cited by 267
Wynants, E., Frooninckx, L., Crauwels, S., Verreth, C., De Smet, J., Sandrock, C., Wohlfahrt, J., Van Schelt, J., Depraetere, S., Lievens, B., et al. (2019) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-018-1286-x · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- EFSA Scientific Committee
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4257
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2738880348
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 44.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed: Risk profile of insects as food and feed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257
- The paper
- EFSA Scientific Committee. (2015). Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed: Risk profile of insects as food and feed. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.