Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 396 of the 396 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA†

Open access
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ricci, Antonia, Allende, Ana, Bolton, Declan, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, Girones, Rosina, Herman, Lieve, Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos, Lindqvist, Roland, Nørrung, Birgit, Robertson, Lucy, Ru, Giuseppe, Sanaa, Moez, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Snary, Emma, Speybroeck, Niko, Ter Kuile, Benno, Threlfall, John, Wahlström, Helene, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Klein, Günter, Prieto Maradona, Miguel, Querol, Amparo, Peixe, Luisa, Suarez, Juan Evaristo, Sundh, Ingvar, Vlak, Just M., Aguilera‐Gómez, Margarita, Barizzone, Fulvio, Brozzi, Rosella, Correia, Sandra, Heng, Leng, Istace, Frédérique, Lythgo, Christopher, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador·2017·EFSA Journal
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

and bacteriophages. The list of QPS-recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore now becomes the valid list. For this update, reports on the safety of previously assessed microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts and viruses (the latter only when used for plant protection purposes) were reviewed, following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. All TUs previously recommended for 2016 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well as their qualifications. The TUs related to the new notifications received since the 2016 QPS opinion was periodically evaluated for QPS status in the Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel, and the QPS list was also periodically updated. In total, 14 new TUs received a QPS status between 2017 and 2019: three yeasts, eight bacteria and three algae/protists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664

Cites

396 of 396 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 396 references

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Ricci, A., Allende, A., Bolton, D., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Girones, R., Herman, L., Koutsoumanis, K., Lindqvist, R., Nørrung, B., Robertson, L., Ru, G., Sanaa, M., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Snary, E., Speybroeck, N., Ter Kuile, B., Threlfall, J., Wahlström, H., Cocconcelli, P. S., Klein, G., Prieto Maradona, M., Querol, A., Peixe, L., Suarez, J. E., Sundh, I., Vlak, J. M., Aguilera‐Gómez, M., Barizzone, F., Brozzi, R., Correia, S., Heng, L., Istace, F., Lythgo, C., & Fernández Escámez, P. S.
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
e04664-e04664
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664
OpenAlex
W2596695108
Cited by
458
References
396
FWCI
53.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA†. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664
The paper
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Ricci, A., Allende, A., Bolton, D., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Girones, R., Herman, L., Koutsoumanis, K., Lindqvist, R., Nørrung, B., Robertson, L., Ru, G., Sanaa, M., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Snary, E., Speybroeck, N., Ter Kuile, B., . . . Fernández Escámez, P. S. (2017). Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA†. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.