CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Latin American history and cultureHistorical Studies in Central AmericaAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nueva Historia del Ecuador, Vol. 2: Época aborigen II

Open access
Landázuri, Cristóbal·2015·Procesos. Revista Ecuatoriana De Historia
DOI 10.29078/rp.v1i1.516
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Este libro es parte de la colección e-Libro en BiblioBoard

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29078/rp.v1i1.516

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Landázuri, C.
Venue
Procesos. Revista Ecuatoriana De Historia
Publisher
Procesos: Revista Ecuatoriana de Historia
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
108
ISSN
  • 1390-0099 (ISSN-L)
  • 2588-0780
DOI
10.29078/rp.v1i1.516
OpenAlex
W1853653536
Cited by
2
References
0
Type
book review
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Procesos Revista ecuatoriana de historia (publishedVersion)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
indigenous peoples, Andean history, Ecuadorian history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review