Cited by 19Linguistics and language evolutionLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisLexicography and Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Dictionary: Christian Sogdian, Syriac and English

Open access
Sims-Williams, Nicholas·2016·Reichert Verlag eBooks

Abstract

Many works of Syriac literature, including some now lost, were translated into Sogdian, a language of the Iranian family. This Dictionary makes the whole material accessible to both Iranists and Syriacists, giving a full semantic and morphological analysis of the attested Christian Sogdian vocabulary. The first part, arranged by Sogdian lemmata, also indicates the various Syriac words which each Sogdian form translates, while the second part, arranged by Syriac lemmata, shows all possible ways of translating any Syriac word into Sogdian. A comprehensive English index adds to the utility of the work. — Since the appearance of the first edition of this Dictionary in 2016, a series of major text-editions have completed the publication of the whole extant Christian Sogdian literature, making this the appropriate time for a new and complete edition of the Dictionary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29091/9783954906482

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. E28/3v-8r (D⌅di⌃o⇤ Qa⌥r⌅y⌅ on Abba Isaiah): Draguet 1972. E28/8 (D⌅di⌃o⇤ Qa⌥r⌅y⌅ on the Paradise of the Fathers): Sims-Williams 1994, 46-8. E28/9-10 (Eugenius): Bedjan, AMS III, 431-3, 442-5; BT XLII, *3-*9. E28/12, 14 (Isaac of Nineveh): Oxford MS Bodl. syr. e. 7, ff. 10-12. E28/27 (Tarbo): Bedjan, AMS II, 254-6; BT XLII, *9-*16. E28/65v (Apellen): BT XLII, *16-*20. E29/8 (Cyriacus and Julitta): Bedjan, AMS III, 255-6. E30/3-7 (A⇥iqar): where possible a Syriac text is cited (from SA or Nau 1920); where necessary non-Syriac versions are cited from SA. E32: see under E6 above. E46: Syriac text on v margin, see Cat., 191. E47 (Numerals): Syriac text of the same MS as edited in BT XXXII, 136. Parallels to the Christian Sogdian manuscripts in Sogdian script Psalms: Walter 1980. In a few cases where the Sogdian text agrees with the Septuagint more
  2. Dickens, M., & Sims-Williams, N., 2012. 'Christian calendrical fragments from Turfan', Living the Lunar Calendar (ed. J. Ben-Dov et al.), Oxford, 269-95. DMT III/2 =
  3. Gershevitch, I., 1946. 'On the Sogdian St. George Passion', Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1946, 179-84 and addenda slip. [Reprinted in Gershevitch 1985, 19-24.]
  4. -1954. A grammar of Manichean Sogdian, Oxford [= GMS]. -1975. 'Sogdians on a frogplain', Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Émile Benveniste, Paris, 195-211.
  5. Hunter, E. C. D., & Dickens, M., 2014. Syriac texts from the Berlin Turfan collection (VOHD, V/2: Syrische Handschriften, Teil 2), Stuttgart. JA = Journal Asiatique.
  6. Kiraz, G. A., 1996. Comparative edition of the Syriac Gospels. Aligning the Sinaiticus, Cureton- ianus, Peshî⌅tâ and ĵarklean versions, 4 vols., Leiden.
  7. Payne Smith, J., 1903. A compendious Syriac dictionary, Oxford [= SyrDict].
  8. Payne Smith, R., 1879-1901. Thesaurus Syriacus, Oxford [= ThesSyr].
  9. Pusey, P. E., & Gwilliam, G. H., 1901. Tetraeuangelium Sanctum juxta Simplicem Syrorum versionem, Oxford [= TES].
  10. Schmitt, R., 2017. Review of Sims-Williams 2016a, Kratylos, 62, 227-32.
  11. Sims-Williams, N., 1977. 'The Sogdian fragments of the British Library', Indo-Iranian Journal, 18, 1976 [1977], 43-82. References and bibliographical abbreviations
  12. -1992b. 'The Sogdian fragments of Leningrad II: Mani at the court of the Shahanshah', Bulletin of the Asia Institute, 4, 1990 [1992], 281-8.
  13. -2016a. A Dictionary: Christian Sogdian, Syriac and English (Beiträge zur Iranistik, 41), Wiesbaden [i.e. the 1st edition of the present work].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sims-Williams, N.
Venue
Reichert Verlag eBooks
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2733898857
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reichert Verlag eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Center for International and Regional Studies (Georgetown University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Renmin University of China
  • Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
Keywords
Syriac language, Sogdian language, Syriac literature, translation, vocabulary, lexicography, semantic analysis, morphological analysis, Iranian languages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review