Cited by 66Ethics in Business and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Values and Pragmatic Action: The Challenges of Introducing Ethical Intelligence in Technical Design Communities

Open access
Manders-Huits, Noëmi, Zimmer, Michael·2009·The International Review of Information Ethics

Abstract

relates to notions of power, trust in organizations, and trust in information and information systems as one

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29173/irie87

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI developers often work in an environment that pressures them to cut costs, increase profit, and deliver higher quality systems, and face pressure from management to prioritise company interests.

    “Developers often 'work in an environment which constantly pressures them to cut costs, increase profit and deliver higher quality' systems, and face pressure from management to make decisions that prioritise company interests.”

    From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Many value-conscious design methods exist, including participatory design, reflective design, Values@Play, and Value-Sensitive Design, but thus far they have largely been implemented and studied in academic contexts which are more receptive to normative concerns than commercial settings.

    “Many such methods exist, 60 including participatory design, reflective design, Values@Play, and Value-Sensitive Design, 1 but thus far they have largely been implemented and studied in academic contexts which are more receptive to normative concerns than commercial settings.”

    From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Ethical considerations may be discarded when they conflict with commercial incentives.

    “Unsurprisingly, ethical considerations may be discarded when they conflict with commercial incentives.”

    From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manders-Huits, N., & Zimmer, M.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Venue
The International Review of Information Ethics
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
10
Pages
37-44
ISSN
  • 1614-1687 (ISSN-L)
  • 2563-5638
OpenAlex
W2129241093
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The International Review of Information Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
ethical intelligence, values, power, organizational trust, trust in information systems, information ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review