The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Life of Information
Open accessAbstract
The article reviews The Social Life of Information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pp. ISBN 0-87584-762-5 by John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040711 · Cited by 4,371
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534
Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research
Whittington, R. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606064101 · Cited by 1,972
Orchestrating Innovation Networks
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 · Cited by 1,803
Metadata
- Authors
- Wade, L.
- Venue
- Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Issue
- 29
- ISSN
- 1092-1206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4302333472
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Life of Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29173/istl1840
- The paper
- Wade, L. (2001). Social Life of Information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
