ResearchRabbit (product review)
Open accessAbstract
ResearchRabbit is a scholarly publication discovery tool supported by artificial intelligence (AI).It was developed in 2021 by a team of three in Seattle [1].This tool lets users discover publications related to one or more seed publications with the help of visualization maps and lists of earlier, later, and similar publications.ResearchRabbit is designed to support the workflow of unstructured searching while providing a left-to-right trail from the original publication(s) through any selected authors or publications.These trails, which can run as deep as rabbit holes, suggest the origin of the tool's name.To start using ResearchRabbit, users first need to create an account.Then they need to create a collection and add at least one publication.The more publications that are added, the better ResearchRabbit can understand users' interests and generate recommendations similar to the contents of the collection.Publications can be added either by uploading a RIS or BibTeX file or by using ResearchRabbit's search, powered by PubMed, if users are searching the medical sciences, or Semantic Scholar, for any other subject area.While ResearchRabbit uses PubMed's and Semantic Scholar's search engines, the company claims its unique database of "100s of millions of academic articles" is second in size only to Google Scholar [2].Once publications are in a collection, ResearchRabbit's algorithm will begin generating recommendations.These recommendations can be explored through two modes: 1) by Papers that are Similar work, Earlier work, or Later work or 2) by People that provide additional publications that These authors or Suggested authors have published (Figure 1).These recommendations are depicted using visualization maps.Fig. 1 Different exploration modes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An AI-powered tool, Research Rabbit, was used for snowball sampling, and all suggested articles were subjected to the same two-step manual screening by two reviewers to ensure transparency and mitigate selection biases.
“An AI-powered tool, Research Rabbit, was utilized to facilitate snowball sampling by identifying related literature based on the included studies from the electronic database searches. All suggested articles were subsequently subjected to the same rigorous, two-step manual screening process by two reviewers to ensure transparency and mitigate the risk of introducing new selection biases or missing”
From Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
AI tools can aid the researcher in collecting relevant research articles, identifying knowledge gaps in the literature, formulating research questions, recommending appropriate statistical methods for the available data, creating a graphical representation of the data, and manuscript writing.
“AI tools can aid the researcher in collecting relevant research articles, identifying the knowledge gaps in the literature, formulating research questions, recommending appropriate statistical methods for the available data, creating a graphical representation of the data, and manuscript writing [32-35].”
From Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
ResearchRabbit enables researchers in medical institutes with novel ways to search for articles and writers, monitor research landscapes, and collaborate with researchers from other institutes.
“ResearchRabbit (Human Intelligence Technologies Incorporated, Seattle, WA, USA), an AI-based tool developed in 2021, enables researchers in medical institutes with novel ways to search for articles and writers, monitor research landscapes, and collaborate with researchers from other institutes.”
From Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Drowning in the literature? These smart software tools can help
Matthews, D. R. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02346-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education
Narayanan, S., Ramakrishnan, R., Durairaj, E., & Das, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.49604 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Amaya-Santos, S., Vargas, C., & Bermúdez-Tamayo, C. (2026) · Public Health in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100713 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“All suggested articles were subsequently subjected to the same rigorous, two-step manual screening process by two reviewers to ensure transparency and mitigate the risk of introducing new selection biases or missing relevant articles [26].”
- Authors
- Cole, V., & Boutet, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2023-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 43-47
- ISSN
- 1708-6892 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10403115
- OpenAlex
- W4385450722
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- AI-based recommendation, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, author co-citation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review