The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Contempt and Compassion: Media Biases and Their Effect on Juror Impartiality and Wrongful Convictions
Open accessAbstract
Public Contempt and Compassion: Media Biases and Their Effect on Juror Impartiality and Wrongful Convictions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chancellor's study of pre-trial publicity in the Guy Paul Morin and Robert Baltovich cases found that the pre-trial publicity served to accentuate public outrage and likely denied the exonerees a fair trial.
“and (iii) the pre-trial publicity in these cases served to accentuate public outrage and, essentially cause exonerees Guy Paul Morin and Robert Baltovich to, more than likely, be denied a fair trial.”
From “The Jogger and the Wolfpack”: An Analysis of the TRANSITIVITY Patterns in the Global Media Coverage of the 1989 Central Park Five Case (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Another factor yet to appear among the more established list of wrongful conviction causes is how press coverage of a case during the lead up to trial may also play a part.
“Secondly and, although touched upon in other research [5,23], another factor yet to appear among the more established list of wrongful conviction causes is how the press coverage of a case during the lead up to trial may also play a part.”
From “The Jogger and the Wolfpack”: An Analysis of the TRANSITIVITY Patterns in the Global Media Coverage of the 1989 Central Park Five Case (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bartley, L. V. (2024) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-023-10026-x · Cited by 2
Plagues in Our Criminal Justice System
Taylor-Baer, C., & Anderson, G. S. (2024) · The Wrongful Conviction Law Review · doi:10.29173/wclawr103 · Cited by 2
Karas, Ž. (2023) · Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu · doi:10.54070/hljk.30.2.3
McCullough, M., & Lewis, A. (2025) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287251401185
Expanding wrongful conviction analyses: a framework to foreground temporality and change
Norris, R. J., Umamaheswar, J., & Drummond, C. B. (2026) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-025-10263-0
Fighting Fire with Facts: Detecting, Decoding, and Dismantling Online Propaganda
Kingdon, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10296-6_12
The Impact of Social Media on the Realization of the Right to a Fair Trial in the Republic of Kosovo
Qatani, V., Krasniqi, B., Etemi-Ademi, B., & Jakupi, S. (2026) · Access to Justice in Eastern Europe · doi:10.33327/ajee-18-9.4-s0002014
Metadata
- Authors
- Chancellor, L.
- Corresponding author
- Chancellor, Lauren
- Venue
- Manitoba Law Journal
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2019-10-29
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0076-3861 (ISSN-L)
- 2818-2502
- OpenAlex
- W3194651496
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Manitoba Law Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Keywords
- media bias, juror impartiality, wrongful convictions, compassion, jury selection, media coverage of trials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
